ArticleEmergency radiology2009
The accuracy of focused abdominal CT in patients presenting to the emergency department.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective analysis of incidental non-trauma associated findings in severely injured patients identified by whole-body spiral CT scans.Patient safety in surgery · 2014Article
- Whole-body CT in polytrauma patients: effect of arm positioning on thoracic and abdominal image quality.Emergency radiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focused computed tomography(CT) examination (FCT) is CT limited to a specific abdominal area in an attempt to reduce radiation exposure. We wanted to evaluate FCT on the basis of information from the request form and thus reduce radiation dose to the patient without missing relevant findings. We retrospectively analyzed 189 consecutive acute abdominal CT, dividing the findings as localized in the upper or lower abdomen. Another researcher blindly determined where the CT should be focused to, based only on information provided in the request form. The sensitivity and specificity of FCT in patients with symptoms from only upper abdomen was 100%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FCT in patients with symptom from only lower abdomen were 79%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. Our study suggests that among patients with symptoms from the lower abdomen, not examining the upper abdomen would lead to missing relevant findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18998177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.