Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18998128›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2009

Modified peptides in anti-cancer vaccines: are we eventually improving anti-tumour immunity?

Manuela Iero, Paola Filipazzi, Chiara Castelli, Filiberto Belli, Riccardo Valdagni, Giorgio Parmiani, Roberto Patuzzo, Mario Santinami, Licia Rivoltini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Recommendations from the iSBTc-SITC/FDA/NCI Workshop on Immunotherapy Biomarkers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2011
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manuela IeroUnit of Immunotherapy of Human Tumours, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Paola Filipazzi
Chiara Castelli
Filiberto Belli
Riccardo Valdagni
Giorgio Parmiani
Roberto Patuzzo
Mario Santinami
Licia Rivoltini
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of tumour antigens recognized by T cells and the features of immune responses directed against them has paved the way to a multitude of clinical studies aimed at boosting anti-tumour T cell immunity as a therapeutic tool for cancer patients. One of the different strategies explored to ameliorate the immunogenicity of tumour antigens in vaccine protocols is represented by the use of optimized peptides or altered peptide ligands, whose amino acid sequence has been modified for improving HLA binding or TCR interaction with respect to native epitopes. However, despite the promising results achieved with preclinical studies, the clinical efficacy of this approach has not yet met the expectations. Although multiple reasons could explain the relative failure of altered peptide ligands as more effective cancer vaccines, the possibility that T cells primed by modified tumour peptides might may be unable to effectively cross-recognize tumour cells has not been sufficiently addressed. Indeed, the introduction of conservative amino acid substitutions may still produce diverse and unpredictable changes in the HLA/peptide interface, with consequent modifications of the TCR repertoire that can interact with the complex. This could lead to the expansion of a broad array of T cells whose TCRs may not necessarily react with equivalent affinity with the original antigenic epitope. Considering the results presently achieved with this vaccine approach, and the emerging availability of alternative strategies for boosting anti-tumour immunity, the use of modified tumour peptides could be reconsidered.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesHumansNeoplasmsPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-Lymphocyte SubsetsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID18998128
PMCPMC11030573
OpenAlexW2111468537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.