ArticleBone marrow transplantation2009
Haematopoietic repopulating activity in human cord blood CD133+ quiescent cells.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insight into microRNAs' involvement in hematopoiesis: current standing point of findings.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Dynamics of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell differentiation to the erythroid lineage.Experimental hematology · 2023Review
- Molecular analysis of CD133-positive circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Journal of translational science · 2015Article
- Wnt1 Accelerates an Ex Vivo Expansion of Human Cord Blood CD34(+)CD38(-) Cells.Stem cells international · 2013Article
- Is it time to revisit our current hematopoietic progenitor cell quantification methods in the clinic?Bone marrow transplantation · 2012Review
- Combined characterization of microRNA and mRNA profiles delineates early differentiation pathways of CD133+ and CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We have demonstrated previously that cord blood CD133(+) cells isolated in the G(0) phase of the cell cycle are highly enriched for haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) activity, in contrast to CD133(+)G(1) cells. Here, we have analysed the phenotype and functional properties of this population in more detail. Our data demonstrate that a large proportion of the CD133(+)G(0) cells are CD38 negative (60.4%) and have high aldehyde dehydrogenase activity (75.1%) when compared with their CD133(+)G(1) counterparts (13.5 and 4.1%, respectively). This suggests that stem cell activity resides in the CD133(+)G(0) population. In long-term BM cultures, the CD133(+)G(0) cells generate significantly more progenitors than the CD34(+)G(0) population (P<0.001) throughout the culture period. Furthermore, a comparison of CD133(+)G(0) versus CD133(+)G(1) cells revealed that multilineage reconstitution was obtained only in non-obese diabetic/SCID animals receiving G(0) cells. We conclude that CD133(+) cells in the quiescent phase of the cell cycle have a phenotype consistent with HSCs and are highly enriched for repopulating activity when compared with their G(1) counterparts. This cell population should prove useful for selection and manipulation in ex vivo expansion protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.