ArticleBone marrow transplantation2009
Comparison of high-dose CY and growth factor with growth factor alone for mobilization of stem cells for transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor pegfilgrastim (lipegfilgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.International journal of hematology · 2021Trial
- Filgrastim-alone versus pegylated filgrastim-alone for autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2017Trial
- Bendamustine, etoposide and dexamethasone to mobilize peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2016Trial
- Successful mobilization of PBSCs predicts favorable outcomes in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents and autologous transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2015Trial
- Steady-State Versus Chemotherapy-Based Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Study to Analyze Efficacy and Safety.Journal of hematology · 2024Article
- Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023Review
- Article
- On-demand plerixafor added to high-dose cyclophosphamide and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the mobilization of patients with multiple myeloma: a treatment with high effectiveness, convenient, and affordable cost.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- High Efficacy of Stem Cell Mobilization With Etoposide+Cytarabine Plus G-CSF in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Meloxicam with Filgrastim may Reduce Oxidative Stress in Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells during Mobilization of Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Article
- Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies to support high-dose chemotherapy: A focus on relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors.World journal of clinical oncology · 2021Review
- The association of mobilising regimen on immune reconstitution and survival in myeloma patients treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction followed by a melphalan autograft.Bone marrow transplantation · 2021Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy-Based Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Are Poor Responders to Induction: The Mayo Clinic Experience.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2021Article
- Initial Therapeutic Approaches to Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Advances in therapy · 2021Review
- Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide +/- Plerixafor versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor +/- Plerixafor in the Lenalidomide Era.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2021Article
- Parameters affecting successful stem cell collections for genetic therapies in sickle cell disease.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2021Review
- Autologous stem-cell collection following VTD or VRD induction therapy in multiple myeloma: a single-center experience.Bone marrow transplantation · 2021Article
- Cost and efficacy of peripheral stem cell mobilization strategies in multiple myeloma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020Observational
- Plerixafor on-demand in association with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF in the mobilization of patients with multiple myeloma: High effectiveness, low toxicity, and affordable cost.Leukemia research reports · 2020Article
- [Advances in mobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 716 patients with multiple myeloma who were mobilized using CY and growth factor (n=370) or growth factor alone (n=346) before SCT. Patients receiving CY had higher stem cell yields than the growth factor only group (median number of apheresis sessions needed to achieve stem cell collection goals, two vs four sessions, respectively (P=0.001)). However, patients treated with CY required more time for engraftment of platelets and neutrophils (P<0.001 for both). For patients receiving CY, 75% achieved engraftment (defined as a platelet count of 50 x 10(9)/l) by day 39, whereas 75% of patients not receiving CY achieved engraftment by day 18. Similar results were observed for neutrophil engraftment. These differences did not affect the duration of hospitalization, but patients treated with CY had a higher incidence of post transplant nonstaphylococcal bacteremia. For CY-mobilized patients, considerably faster platelet engraftment (5 fewer days) resulted if stem cell reinfusion occurred more than 30 days after the first apheresis session. Our data suggested that CY damaged the microenvironment and slowed engraftment. By lengthening the period between the completion of apheresis and stem cell reinfusion, the microenvironment may recover and result in faster engraftment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.