Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18995996›Full record

ReviewArchives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie2008

[Organization of intensive care in situation of avian flu pandemic].

B Guery, B Guidet, S Beloucif, D Floret, C Legall, P Montravers, C Chouaid, P H Jarreau, B Régnier

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B GueryLa Société de pathologie infectieuse de langue française, France. bguery@invivo.edu
B Guidet
S Beloucif
D Floret
C Legall
P Montravers
C Chouaid
P H Jarreau
B Régnier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influenza pandemic will create a major increase in demand for hospital admissions, particularly for critical care services. The recommendations detailed herein have been elaborated by experts from medical societies potentially involved in this situation and focus on general hospital organization. Intensive care units will initially face high demand for admission; the Healthcare Authorities must therefore study how ICU capacity can be expanded. Pediatric intensive care units will be particularly affected by this situation of relative bed shortage, since young children, particularly infants, are expected to be affected by severe clinical forms of avian flu. Therefore, the weight threshold for admission to the adult ICU was lowered to 20 kg. Neonatal intensive care units (NICU) should remain, if possible, low viral density areas. Mixed (neonatal and pediatric) intensive care units could be dedicated to infants and children only. NICU admission of extreme premature babies should be limited in this difficult situation. Pediatric intensive care units (PICU) admission capacity could be doubled by using intermediate care and postoperative care units. The staff could be increased by doctors and nurses involved in canceled programmed activities. Healthcare workers transferred to PICU should be given special training.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeAdolescentAdultAnimalsBirdsChildChild, PreschoolFranceHospitals, GeneralHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza, HumanInfluenza in BirdsIntensive Care Units, Neonatal

Identifiers

PMID18995996
PMCPMC7127334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.