Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18991063›Full record

Trial reportInhalation toxicology2009

ECG parameters and exposure to carbon ultrafine particles in young healthy subjects.

Wojciech Zareba, Jean Philippe Couderc, Günter Oberdörster, David Chalupa, Christopher Cox, Li-Shan Huang, Annette Peters, Mark J Utell, Mark W Frampton

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Inhalation toxicology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. [Effects of ultrafine particulates on cardiac function in rat isolated heart].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Psychological stress: a social pollutant that may enhance environmental risk.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wojciech ZarebaDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Jean Philippe Couderc
Günter Oberdörster
David Chalupa
Christopher Cox
Li-Shan Huang
Annette Peters
Mark J Utell
Mark W Frampton

Funding

VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI B Paige Lawrence · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
YOHIMBINE CHALLENGE IN PARKINSONIAN PATIENTS WITH PANIC DISORDERM01RR000044 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GUZICK, DAVID S · 1985 to 2006
$13.8M
MULTIDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN PULMONARY RESEARCHT32HL066988 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GEORAS, STEVE N, O'REILLY, MICHAEL A · 2001 to 2021
$8.1M
Ultrafine Particle Exposure in HumansR01ES011853 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FRAMPTON, MARK W · 2002 to 2005
$1.6M
Ultrafine Particle-Induced Oxidative StressR01ES013394 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FRAMPTON, MARK WALTER · 2004 to 2007
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000044NCRR NIH HHS RR 00044NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL066988NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES001247NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES 01247NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011853NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES013394NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES 13394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying the association between air pollution and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are unknown. This study aimed to determine whether controlled exposure to elemental carbon ultrafine particles (UFP) affects electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters describing heart rate variability; repolarization duration, morphology, and variability; and changes in the ST segment. Two separate controlled studies (12 subjects each) were performed using a crossover design, in which each subject was exposed to filtered air and carbon UFP for 2 hours. The first protocol involved 2 exposures to air and 10 microg/m(3) (approximately 2 x 10(6) particles/cm(3), count median diameter approximately 25 nm, geometric standard deviation approximately 1.6), at rest. The second protocol included 3 exposures to air, 10, and 25 microg/m(3) UFP (approximately 7 x 10(6) particles/cm(3)), with repeated exercise. Each subject underwent a continuous digital 12-lead ECG Holter recording to analyze the above ECG parameters. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare tested parameters between exposures. The observed responses to UFP exposure were small and generally not significant, although there were trends indicating an increase in parasympathetic tone, which is most likely also responsible for trends toward ST elevation, blunted QTc shortening, and increased variability of T-wave complexity after exposure to UFP. Recovery from exercise showed a blunted response of the parasympathetic system after exposure to UFP in comparison to air exposure. In conclusion, transient exposure to 10-25 microg/m(3) ultrafine carbon particles does not cause marked changes in ECG-derived parameters in young healthy subjects. However, trends are observed indicating that some subjects might be susceptible to air pollution, with a response involving autonomic modulation of the heart and repolarization of the ventricular myocardium.

Indexed as

Electrocardiography, AmbulatoryEnvironmental ExposureAdultCarbonCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodExerciseFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleParticle SizeParticulate MatterSiliconesYoung AdultCarbonParticulate MatterSilicones

Identifiers

PMID18991063
PMCPMC2867237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.