ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2008
Socioeconomic gradients in tiotropium use among adults with COPD.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Trends in prescriptions and costs of inhaled medications in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a 19-year population-based study from Canada.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Article
- Ethnic Differences in Persistence with COPD Medications: a Register-Based Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2017Article
- Defining and targeting health disparities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016Review
- Socioeconomic status, race and COPD health outcomes.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2011Article
- Further exploration of the links between occupational exposure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInequalities in the use of new medications may contribute to health disparities. We analyzed socioeconomic gradients in the use of tiotropium for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
methodsIn a cohort of adults with COPD aged > or = 55 years identified through population-based sampling, we elicited questionnaire responses on demographics, socioeconomic status (SES; lower SES defined as high school education or less or annual household income < US $20,000), and medication use and other clinical variables. In a subset we obtained pulmonary function testing. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to estimate the associations between SES and tiotropium use in COPD, adjusting for disease severity measured by a COPD Severity Score.
resultsOf 427 subjects, 44 (10.3%) reported using tiotropium in 2006. Adjusting for COPD severity, lower SES was associated with reduced odds of tiotropium use (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.7; p = 0.005). Among the subset with lung function data (n = 95), after including COPD Global Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Stage > or = 2 in the model, lower SES remained associated with reduced odds oftiotropium use (OR 0.03; 95% CI < 0.001-0.7; p = 0.03). Including forced expiratory volume in one second in the model as a continuous variable instead of GOLD Stage > or = 2 yielded similar results for lower SES (OR 0.1; 95% CI < 0.001-0.5; p = 0.02).
conclusionThere was a strong SES gradient in tiotropium use such that there was less use with lower SES. To the extent that this is an efficacious medication for COPD, this gradient represents a potential source of health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.