ArticleCancer letters2009
EMMPRIN expression is required for response to bevacizumab therapy in HNSCC xenografts.
Article in Cancer letters, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted therapy for head and neck cancer: signaling pathways and clinical studies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- CD147 promotes the proliferation, invasiveness, migration and angiogenesis of human lung carcinoma cells.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Predictive markers of efficacy for an angiopoietin-2 targeting therapeutic in xenograft models.PloS one · 2013Article
- Investigation of the efficacy of a bevacizumab-cetuximab-cisplatin regimen in treating head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in mice.Targeted oncology · 2010Article
- Anti-EMMPRIN antibody treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in an ex-vivo model.Anti-cancer drugs · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The HNSCC cell line, FaDu was stably transfected with control vector (FaDu) or with plasmid expressing small interfering RNA against EMMPRIN (FaDu/siE). Tumor cells were treated with bevacizumab (0, 25, 50, and 75 ng/ml) in vitro, and then cell counts were performed at 72 h. For in vivo analysis, tumor cells were xenografted onto the flank of SCID mice, and were treated with 100 microg bevacizumab twice weekly for three weeks. Xenograft samples from the control and treatment groups were analyzed for microvessel density. Escalating doses of bevacizumab had no effect on the growth of tumor cells in vitro (P.or=0.086). However, tumor xenografts expressing EMMPRIN responded to bevacizumab treatment (P=0.0013), whereas the EMMPRIN knockdown cell line did not (P=0.7942). Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that microvascular density was reduced in the treated FaDu tumors (P=0.005), but not in the FaDu/siE tumors (P=0.48). Currently there is limited information on biomarkers to predict response to bevacizumab. By demonstrating effectiveness of bevacizumab therapy in tumors that express EMMPRIN, but not in tumors with silenced EMMPRIN expression, this study suggests that EMMPRIN may serve as a biomarker for response to bevacizumab treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.