Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18990119›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2008

Spatial neglect: clinical and neuroscience review: a wealth of information on the poverty of spatial attention.

John C Adair, Anna M Barrett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Peripheral Prisms Improve Obstacle Detection during Simulated Walking for Patients with Left Hemispatial Neglect and Hemianopia.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John C AdairDepartment of Neurology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Neurology Service, New Mexico Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108-5153, USA. john.adair@va.gov
Anna M Barrett
Rutgers New Jersey Medical SchoolUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Building a science for treatment of spatial neglectR01NS055808 · NINDS · KESSLER FOUNDATION, INC. · PI BARRETT, A. M. · 2008 to 2011
$1.6M
Spatial neglect and bias in near and far spaceK02NS047099 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI BARRETT, A. M. · 2004 to 2008
$746k
NINDS NIH HHS K02 NS047099NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemispatial neglect (HSN) is a frequent, conspicuous neurobehavioral accompaniment of brain injury. Patients with HSN share several superficial similarities, leading earlier clinical neuroscientists to view neglect as a unitary condition associated with brain structures that mediate relatively discrete spatial cognitive mechanisms. Over the last two decades, research largely deconstructed the neglect syndrome, revealing a remarkable heterogeneity of behaviors and providing insight into multiple component processes, both spatial and nonspatial, that contribute to hemispatial neglect. This review surveys visual HSN, presenting first the means for detection and diagnosis in its manifold variations. We summarize cognitive operations relevant to spatial attention and evidence for their role in neglect behaviors and then briefly consider neural systems that may subserve the component processes. Finally, we propose several methods for rehabilitating HSN, including the challenges facing remediation of such a heterogeneous cognitive disorder.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionCognitionHumansPerceptual DisordersPsychomotor PerformanceSpace Perception

Identifiers

PMID18990119
PMCPMC2962986
OpenAlexW1728601628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.