ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2009
Phase I study of paclitaxel with standard dose ifosfamide in children with refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group study (POG 9376).
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in children and adolescent cancer patients.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Biodegradable Polymeric Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery to Solid Tumors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Natural compounds for pediatric cancer treatment.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA dose-escalation Phase I study of taxol (paclitaxel) administered in combination with standard dose ifosfamide was conducted in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors. Primary objectives were to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). PATIENTS AND
methodsPaclitaxel was administered as a 6-hr continuous infusion (hr 0-6), followed by intravenous ifosfamide (2 g/m(2)/day x 3 days) over 1 hr at hours 6-7, 24-25, and 48-49. Patients at dose level 1 received 250 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. Subsequent dose escalation proceeded using a standard 3 x 3 Phase I design.
resultsFifteen patients received a combined 46 courses of therapy. The median age was 14.5 years (range, 2-19 years), and diagnoses included sarcoma (7), neuroblastoma (3), and other (5). Three patients received paclitaxel at 250 mg/m(2) (10 courses), six at 325 mg/m(2) (19 courses), three at 425 mg/m(2) (8 courses), and three at 550 mg/m(2) (9 courses). DLTs occurred in 2/3 patients at 550 mg/m(2) paclitaxel during cycle 1, including grade 3 hypotension and grade 4 anaphylaxis in 1 patient each. Common non-dose-limiting toxicities included bone marrow suppression and peripheral neuropathy. Response was evaluable in 14 patients and included mixed response (3), stable disease (5), and progressive disease (6).
conclusionPaclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions were dose limiting when the drug was administered as a 6-hr infusion. The MTD and recommended Phase II dose of paclitaxel administered as a 6-hr continuous intravenous infusion followed by standard dose intravenous ifosfamide is 425 mg/m(2) paclitaxel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.