Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18988606›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of health law2008

European Union. Ethical considerations for clinical trials on medicinal products conducted with the paediatric population.

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of health law, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06012266 (Dose Rationale for Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin in Paediatric Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06012266 phase2unknown statusstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Dose Rationale for Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin in Paediatric Heart Failure: a Phase II.a Pharmacokinetics, Ease-of-swallow, Safety and Proof-of-concept Study Among Children 6-18 Years of Age

Ran2024Enrolled12Registered outcomes19Posted comparisons0ConditionsHeart FailureArmsDapagliflozin Tablet, Empagliflozin Tablets
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Intermittent versus daily therapy for treating tuberculosis in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This document has been developed by the ad hoc group for the development of implementing guidelines for Directive 2001/20/EC relating to good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, chaired by the European Commission. The document provides recommendations on various ethical aspects of clinical trials performed in children from birth up to the legal age of adulthood. This will contribute to the protection of all children who are the subject of clinical trials. As the approval of clinical trials, including ethical approval, is performed by the Member States, any recommendations on ethical aspects of clinical trials in children will also facilitate a harmonised approach to the application of the clinical trials directive across the EU, thereby facilitating the conduct of clinical trials in the EU and in whichever country the paediatric trial occurs. The protection against the risks of research in such a vulnerable population is paramount whilst this should not lead to denying them the benefits of research. Children are not small adults and there is a need to carry out specific trials that cannot be performed in adults. In general, children (minors) are unable to consent (in the legal sense) but their assent should be sought using age appropriate information. Ethics Committees need paediatric expertise to balance the benefits and risks of research in children. The lack of legal ability to consent has implications on the design, analysis and the choice of comparators used in trials, which should only be performed by trained investigators with paediatric experience. Pain, fear, distress and parental separation should be prevented and minimised when unavoidable. The neonate represents the most vulnerable of all paediatric age groups and requires even more careful review. Finally, various other aspects relating to the performance of trials in children are discussed.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchMinorsPublic PolicyAdolescentAge FactorsBiomedical ResearchChildChild WelfareClinical Trials as TopicEthics Committees, ResearchEuropean UnionFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMaleRisk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.