Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18988250›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2008

Monitoring response to chemotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma xenografts by T(2)-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI.

Ming Q Huang, Stephen Pickup, David S Nelson, Hui Qiao, He N Xu, Lin Z Li, Rong Zhou, E James Delikatny, Harish Poptani, Jerry D Glickson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Serial diffusion MRI to monitor and model treatment response of the targeted nanotherapy CRLX101.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging in lymphoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2010
    Review
  15. Biology and treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ming Q HuangMolecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Stephen Pickup
David S Nelson
Hui Qiao
He N Xu
Lin Z Li
Rong Zhou
E James Delikatny
Harish Poptani
Jerry D Glickson
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

1H NMR STUDIES OF NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMAR01CA101700 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GLICKSON, JERRY D · 2004 to 2012
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101700NCI NIH HHS R01-CA101700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An effective method for in vivo detection of early therapeutic response of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma would enable personalized clinical management of cancer therapy and facilitate the design of optimal treatment regimens. This study evaluates the feasibility of T(2)-weighted MRI (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) for in vivo detection of response of human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma xenografts in severe combined immunodeficient mice to chemotherapy. Each cycle of combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, hydroxydoxorubicin, Oncovin, prednisone, and bryostatin 1 (CHOPB) was administered to tumor-carrying mice weekly for up to four cycles. T2WI and DWI were performed before the initiation of CHOPB and after each cycle of CHOPB. In order to corroborate the MRI results, histological analyses were carried out on control tumors and treated tumors after completion of all MRI studies. DWI revealed a significant (P < 0.03) increase in the mean apparent diffusion coefficient in CHOPB-treated tumors as early as 1 week after initiation of CHOPB. However, a significant (P < 0.03) decrease in mean T(2) was observed only after two cycles of CHOPB. Both MRI methods produced high-resolution (0.1 x 0.1 x 1.0 mm(3)) maps of regional therapeutic response in the treated tumors based on local apparent diffusion coefficient and T(2). Only a specific region of the tumors (in 3 of the 5 tumors) corresponding to about one third of the tumor volume exhibited a response-associate increase in ADC and decrease in T(2). An adjacent region exhibited an increase in T(2) and no change in ADC. The rest of the tumor was indistinguishable from sham-treated controls by MRI criteria. The therapeutic response of the treated tumors detected by MRI was accompanied by changes in tumor cell density, proliferation and apoptosis revealed by histological studies performed upon completion of the longitudinal study. The mechanism producing the regional response of the tumor remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Line, TumorDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFeasibility StudiesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMicePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18988250
PMCPMC6594105
OpenAlexW2081006718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.