Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18988005›Full record

ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2008

[Individualized management and therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes].

Reinhard Stauder, Friedrich Wimazal, Thomas Nösslinger, Otto Krieger, Wolfgang R Sperr, Heinz Sill, Michael Pfeilstöcker, Peter Valent

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Comorbidity oriented oncology - an overview].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2010
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Reinhard StauderDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. reinhard.stauder@i-med.ac.at
Friedrich Wimazal
Thomas Nösslinger
Otto Krieger
Wolfgang R Sperr
Heinz Sill
Michael Pfeilstöcker
Peter Valent

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and a tendency to transition to acute myeloid leukemia. Due to the increasing number of older patients in Austria and the high frequency of therapy-associated MDS following successful chemo- and/or radiotherapy of a primary tumor, the frequency and relevance of MDS are continuously increasing. While therapeutic options were until recently limited to best supportive care, AML-like induction chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in younger patients, in recent years new therapeutic options have become available. Supportive care was improved through the introduction of effective iron chelation and the availability of hematopoietic growth factors like erythropoiesis-stimulating factors (ESF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF). In addition, immune-modulating drugs (IMiDs) like lenalidomide or epigenetically effective agents like the cytosine analogues or histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have become available and are highly effective in distinct subgroups of MDS patients. The development of state-of-the art recommendations is one of the major aims of the MDS Platform of the Austrian Society of Hematology and Oncology. This manuscript reviews recent developments in clinical scoring and targeted and individualized MDS therapy and discusses their relevance in and potential applicability to daily practice.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHumansImmunologic FactorsMyelodysplastic SyndromesStem Cell TransplantationAntineoplastic AgentsImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.