ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009
Molecular epidemiology of Candida albicans and its closely related yeasts Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Avian Candidiasis: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Control.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- HWP1 Gene Sequence Diversity and Antifungal Susceptibility Patterns in Colombian Vulvovaginal Isolates of theInternational journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Reported prevalence and comparison of diagnostic approaches for Candida africana: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2024Review
- Lack of Candida africana in Ugandan pregnant women: results from a pilot study using MALDI-ToF.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Article
- Prevalence of Closely RelatedPolish journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- Overview on the Infections Related to RarePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Molecular discrimination and antifungal susceptibility profile of crypticIranian journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Multiple surface interaction mechanisms direct the anchoring, co-aggregation and formation of dual-species biofilm betweenJournal of advanced research · 2022Article
- Differentiation ofCurrent medical mycology · 2021Article
- Low prevalence of antifungal resistantHeliyon · 2020Article
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of Virulence Factors of Homozygous and Heterozygous Strains ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2020Article
- Identification of Cryptic Species of FourJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Evaluation of biofilm formation in the homozygous and heterozygous strains of vaginalCurrent medical mycology · 2019Article
- Candida parapsilosis: from Genes to the Bedside.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Identification of uncommon oral yeasts from cancer patients by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Whole Genome-Based Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis Reveals Genetic Diversity inFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Evaluation of CAMP-Like Effect, Biofilm Formation, and Discrimination ofJournal of pathogens · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a molecular study to determine the occurrence of Candida albicans, Candida africana, and Candida dubliniensis in different clinical samples. The study provides new insights into the epidemiology of candidiasis in hospitalized patients in three hospitals in southern Italy. It also reports the first detailed epidemiological data concerning the occurrence of C. africana in clinical samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.