SynthesisBMC health services research2008
Case management used to optimize cancer care pathways: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of case management for cancer patients: an umbrella review.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Can case management improve cancer patients quality of life?: A systematic review following PRISMA.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Case management to increase quality of life after cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial.BMC cancer · 2017Trial
- Impacts of a navigation program based on health information technology for patients receiving oral anticancer therapy: the CAPRI randomized controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2017Trial
- Effects of a case management program on patients with oral precancerous lesions: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Characterizing Different Multidisciplinary Team Models Implemented Within One Comprehensive Cancer Center.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- The use of cognitive task analysis in clinical and health services research - a systematic review.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Review
- Bibliometric analysis of cancer care operations management: current status, developments, and future directions.Health care management science · 2022Review
- Factors influencing the delivery of cancer pathways: a summary of the literature.Journal of health organization and management · 2021Article
- Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Development of a benchmark tool for cancer centers; results from a pilot exercise.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Economic evaluation of patient navigation programs in colorectal cancer care, a systematic review.Health economics review · 2018Review
- The oncology nurse coordinator: role perceptions of staff members and nurse coordinators.Israel journal of health policy research · 2017Article
- A prospective study on the characteristics and subjects of pediatric palliative care case management provided by a hospital based palliative care team.BMC palliative care · 2017Article
- Treatment-related experiences and preferences of patients with lung cancer: a qualitative analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016Article
- Case management in primary palliative care is associated more strongly with organisational than with patient characteristics: results from a cross-sectional prospective study.BMC palliative care · 2015Article
- Application of integrative information system improves the quality and effectiveness of cancer case management.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2015Article
- Survivorship care plans: a work in progress.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2014Review
- Information needs of early-stage prostate cancer patients: within- and between-group agreement of patients and health professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReports of inadequate cancer patient care have given rise to various interventions to support cancer care pathways which, overall, seem poorly studied. Case management (CM) is one method that may support a cost-effective, high-quality patient-centred treatment and care.The purpose of this article was to summarise intervention characteristics, outcomes of interest, results, and validity components of the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining CM as a method for optimizing cancer care pathways.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for RCTs published all years up to August 2008. Identified papers were included if they passed the following standards. INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1) The intervention should meet the criteria for CM which includes multidisciplinary collaboration, care co-ordination, and it should include in-person meetings between patient and the case manager aimed at supporting, informing and educating the patient. 2) The intervention should focus on cancer patient care. 3) The intervention should aim to improve subjective or objective quality outcomes, and effects should be reported in the paper. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies centred on cancer screening or palliative cancer care.Data extraction was conducted in order to obtain a descriptive overview of intervention characteristics, outcomes of interest and findings. Elements of CONSORT guidelines and checklists were used to assess aspects of study validity.
resultsThe searches identified 654 unique papers, of which 25 were retrieved for scrutiny. Seven papers were finally included. Intervention characteristics, outcomes studied, findings and methodological aspects were all very diverse.
conclusionDue to the scarcity of papers included (seven), significant heterogeneity in target group, intervention setting, outcomes measured and methodologies applied, no conclusions can be drawn about the effect of CM on cancer patient care.It is a major challenge that CM shrouds in a "black box", which means that it is difficult to determine which aspect(s) of interventions contribute to overall effects. More trials on rigorously developed CM interventions (opening up the "black box") are needed as is the re-testing of interventions and outcomes studied in various settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.