Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18985298›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2008

Neurophysiological mechanisms of psychotic symptoms.

Werner Strik, Thomas Dierks

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Neurobiology of Formal Thought Disorder.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical handling and understanding of schizophrenia should be based on pathophysiological findings and theories.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Werner StrikUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, Bern 60, Bern, Switzerland. strik@puk.unibe.ch
Thomas Dierks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychotic symptoms are supposed to be expression of highest order brain functions such as symbolic thinking, language, planning, empathy or complex emotional reactions. However, due to its historical roots, current psychiatric symptomatology is based on descriptions of disturbed behavior, which refer to metaphysic concepts rather than to brain function. Therefore, modern biological research suffers from an important gap between psychiatric semiology and contemporary knowledge in systems neurophysiology. The authors argue for a redefinition of psychiatric symptoms in a neurobiologically meaningful way. Based on recent empirical studies, this strategy is exemplified for auditory verbal hallucinations and formal thought disorder. In these examples, characteristic psychiatric symptoms can be related to circumscribed structural and functional alterations in the language system, allowing the description of clinical phenomena in terms of neurobiological events. This strategy is also applicable to other psychotic symptoms like emotional dysregulation and catatonia, where disturbances of the functional circuits of mood and motor regulation, respectively, are predicted. This approach to psychiatric symptoms is based on contemporary evidence concerning systems neurophysiology and is expected to provide meaningful and testable hypotheses for future research aimed to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders, to more accurate prognosis and to better targeted therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

BrainNeurophysiologyHumansNerve NetNeural PathwaysPsychotic Disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.