Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18984572›Full record

ArticleGenetics2009

Construction and characterization of deletions with defined end points in Drosophila using P elements in trans.

Adam C Paré, Derek M Dean, John Ewer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic analysis of ecdysis behavior in Drosophila reveals partially overlapping functions of two unrelated neuropeptides.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam C ParéEntomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Derek M Dean
John Ewer
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used P-element transposase-mediated "male recombination" between two P elements in trans to create genetic deletions that removed a number of loci, including the gene encoding the neuropeptide crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP). Two classes of recombinant chromosomes were produced. Approximately one-quarter were viable when homozygous or hemizygous, whereas the remaining lines caused homozygous and hemizygous lethality. Preliminary analyses using PCR and CCAP immunohistochemistry suggested that, whereas the DNA of the viable lines was largely intact, most lethal lines contained chromosomal deletions that were roughly bounded by the insertion sites of the two P elements used. Southern blot analyses of select lethal lines showed that the DNA flanking the deletion was indeed grossly intact whereas the intervening DNA could not be detected. Sequencing across the deletion in three of these lethal lines identified a single line bearing intact genomic DNA on either side of the deletion separated by 30 bp of P-element DNA. The method described here suggests a simple procedure for creating deletions with defined end points. Importantly, it can use preexisting P-element insertion strains and does not rely on the use of transposable elements that are engineered to cause specific DNA rearrangements.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionMutagenesisAnimalsBlotting, SouthernChromosomesDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterGenetic EngineeringHomozygoteLarvaMaleNeuropeptidesRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAcrustacean cardioactive peptideDNA Transposable ElementsNeuropeptides

Identifiers

PMID18984572
PMCPMC2621189
OpenAlexW2172249789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.