ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
Effect of spinal cord stimulation on cardiac adrenergic nerve function in patients with cardiac syndrome X.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Central Nervous System and Psychosocial Factors in Primary Microvascular Angina.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Contemporary treatment of Western and Chinese medicine for cardiac syndrome X.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn patients with cardiac syndrome X (CSX) who present with refractory angina episodes, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has beneficial effects. The mechanisms of SCS, however, remain speculative. We assessed the effects of SCS on cardiac sympathetic function in these patients. METHODS AND
resultsWe studied 11 CSX patients treated by SCS for refractory angina (mean age, 60 +/- 9 years; 5 men and 6 women), both during SCS therapy (SCS-ON) and after withdrawal of SCS therapy (SCS-OFF), using a randomized crossover design. Planar and single photon emission computed tomography iodine 123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) myocardial scintigraphy and technetium 99m sestamibi (MIBI) bicycle exercise stress testing were performed at the end of each period. Compared with 10 healthy control subjects, CSX patients showed a lower heart-mediastinum ratio for MIBG uptake (2.19 +/- 0.3 vs 1.69 +/- 0.3, P = .001) and a higher cardiac MIBG uptake score (4.0 +/- 2.5 vs 19.7 +/- 27, P = .08). There were no differences in CSX patients during the SCS-ON and SCS-OFF phases of the study in heart-mediastinum ratio (1.74 +/- 0.3 vs 1.69 +/- 0.3, P = .13), cardiac washout rate of MIBG (42.9% +/- 14% vs 43.3% +/- 14%, P = .08), or MIBG defect score (18.7 +/- 25 vs 19.7 +/- 27, P = .22). Reversible perfusion defects during the SCS-OFF phase were detected in 8 patients; an improvement in perfusion defects was observed in 2 patients (25%) during the SCS-ON phase.
conclusionsOur data confirm the presence of abnormal cardiac adrenergic nerve function in CSX patients. SCS was unable to result in significant improvement of cardiac MIBG uptake abnormalities, suggesting that its therapeutic effects are unlikely to be mediated by modulation of cardiac adrenergic nerve activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.