ArticlePharmacy world & science : PWS2009
Pharmacological differences between once daily and twice daily gentamicin dosage in newborns with suspected sepsis.
Article in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Factors associated with elevated gentamicin trough levels in neonates: a retrospective analysis of dosing and clinical parameters.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Gentamicin Dosing in Neonates with Normal Renal Function: Trough and Peak Levels.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021Article
- Off-label antibiotic use in children in three European countries.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010Article
- Prevalence and nature of off-label antibiotic prescribing for children in a tertiary setting: A descriptive study from Jordan.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate two different regimens for gentamicin administration (once or twice daily) in newborns with suspected sepsis, and the ability of these regimens to achieve recommended serum gentamicin concentrations (SGC) within the therapeutic range. Setting Neonatal intensive care unit.
methodWe conducted a retrospective study of newborns > or =34 weeks gestational age (GA) admitted with suspected sepsis to the neonatal unit at Stavanger University Hospital from 1st February 2003 to 31st May 2005. During the first period patients received gentamicin 2.5 mg/kg twice daily (n = 62) and during the last period patients received gentamicin 4 mg/kg once daily (n = 73). In both groups, levels of gentamicin were obtained before and after the third given dose.
resultsMean peak levels were lower and mean trough levels were higher in the twice daily regimen compared to the once daily regimen (P < 0.001 for both). About 16 newborns in the twice daily regimen had trough levels higher than the recommended level (<2 microg/ml) compared to two children in the once daily regimen (P < 0.001). High peak levels (>10 microg/ml) were achieved in one child in the twice daily regimen compared to eight children in the once daily regimen (P = 0.04). The number of children with a low peak level (<5 microg/ml) was only three and one respectively (n.s).
conclusionIn newborns with suspected sepsis, gentamicin 4 mg/kg once daily provided higher peak and lower trough gentamicin levels compared to administering gentamicin 2.5 mg twice daily.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.