Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18981997›Full record

ArticleNature clinical practice. Nephrology2009

Re-examining RAS-blocking treatment regimens for abrogating progression of chronic kidney disease.

Murray Epstein

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature clinical practice. Nephrology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Podocytopathy in diabetes: a metabolic and endocrine disorder.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2011
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Murray EpsteinUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Nephrology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL 33125, USA. murraye@gate.net
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary discusses the findings and profound clinical implications of a prespecified analysis of renal outcomes performed by Mann et al. in the large ONTARGET study. This study assessed the effects of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril and the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) telmisartan, separately and in combination, in patients aged at least 55 years who had established vascular disease or diabetes with organ damage. Mann et al. demonstrated that, in contrast to monotherapy with either drug, the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an ARB worsens all major renal outcomes with the exception of proteinuria. This commentary recommends that combination therapy with an ACE inhibitor and an ARB to retard progression of renal disease should be avoided in patients with proteinuria lower than 1 g per day. The utility of dual RAS blockade regimens comprising an ACE inhibitor and a direct renin inhibitor, or an ACE inhibitor or ARB plus an aldosterone blocker, remains to be determined and constitutes a high priority subject for future clinical investigation.

Identifiers

PMID18981997
OpenAlexW1979952964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.