Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18981962›Full record

Trial reportSpine2008

Patient preferences and expectations for care: determinants in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Jon D Lurie, Sigurd H Berven, Jennifer Gibson-Chambers, Tor Tosteson, Anna Tosteson, Serena S Hu, James N Weinstein

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Spine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measuring expectations in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Improving Patient Understanding of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Three-Dimensional Models.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jon D LurieDartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA. jon.d.lurie@dartmouth.edu
Sigurd H Berven
Jennifer Gibson-Chambers
Tor Tosteson
Anna Tosteson
Serena S Hu
James N Weinstein
Dartmouth College · USDartmouth Hospital · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · USDartmouth Psychiatric Research Center · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
LOW BACK PAIN--A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIALU01AR045444 · NIAMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WEINSTEIN, JAMES N · 1999 to 2013
$20.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR045444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designProspective observational cohort.

objectiveTo describe the baseline characteristics of patients with a diagnosis of intervertebral disc herniation who had different treatment preferences and the relationship of specific expectations with those preferences. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Data were gathered from the observational cohort of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Patients in the observational cohort met eligibility requirements identical to those of the randomized cohort, but declined randomization, receiving instead the treatment of their choice.

methodsBaseline preference and expectation data were acquired at the time of enrollment of the patient, before exposure to the informed consent process. Univariate analyses were performed using a t test for continuous variables and chi for categorical variables. Multivariate analyses were also performed with ANCOVA for continuous variables and logistic regression for categorical variables. Multiple logistic regression models were developed in a forward stepwise fashion using blocks of variables.

resultsMore patients preferred operative care: 67% preferred surgery, 28% preferred nonoperative treatment, and 6% were unsure; 53% of those preferring surgery stated a definite preference, whereas only 18% of those preferring nonoperative care had a definite preference. Patients preferring surgery were younger, had lower levels of education, and higher levels of unemployment/disability. This group also reported higher pain, worse physical and mental functioning, more back pain related disability, a longer duration of symptoms, and more opiate use. Gender, race, comorbidities, and use of other therapies did not differ significantly across preference groups. Patients' expectations regarding improvement with nonoperative care was the strongest predictor of preference.

conclusionPatient expectations, particularly regarding the benefit of nonoperative treatment, are the primary determinant of surgery preference among patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Demographic, functional status, and prior treatment experience had significant associations with patients' expectations and preferences.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOrthopedic ProceduresPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionAdultAge FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidBack PainDisability EvaluationEducational StatusFemaleHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLogistic ModelsLumbar VertebraeAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID18981962
PMCPMC2768262
OpenAlexW2062819165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.