Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18981343›Full record

ArticleArchives of general psychiatry2008

Aberrant brain activation during gaze processing in boys with fragile X syndrome.

Christa Watson, Fumiko Hoeft, Amy S Garrett, Scott S Hall, Allan L Reiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of general psychiatry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Emotion potentiated startle in fragile X syndrome.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2014
    Trial
  4. STX209 (arbaclofen) for autism spectrum disorders: an 8-week open-label study.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2014
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Developmental studies in fragile X syndrome.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. A novel eye-tracking paradigm for indexing social avoidance-related behavior in fragile X syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Hidden Markov models for human interactive behavior].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Imaging genetics in neurodevelopmental psychopathology.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christa WatsonCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA 94305-5795, USA.
Fumiko Hoeft
Amy S Garrett
Scott S Hall
Allan L Reiss

Funding

NEUROPSYCHIATRIC-MOLECULAR ASSOCIATIONS IN FRAGILE X SYNR01MH050047 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 1993 to 2022
$12.5M
NIMH NIH HHS MH50047NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextEye contact is a fundamental component of human social behavior. Individuals with fragile X syndrome (fraX), particularly male subjects, avoid eye contact and display other social deficits. To date (to our knowledge), this behavior in fraX has been studied only in female subjects, who show lesser degrees of gaze aversion.

objectiveTo determine the neural correlates of the perception of direct eye gaze in adolescent boys with fraX using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

designCross-sectional study.

settingAcademic medical center.

participantsThirteen adolescent boys with fraX, 10 boys with developmental delay, and 13 typically developing control subjects.

main outcome measuresBehavioral performance and brain activation during functional magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated during the presentation of faces with eye gaze directed to or averted away from subjects and during successive presentations of stimuli with eye gaze directed toward the subject. Whole-brain and region of interest analyses and regression analyses with task performance were performed.

resultsSignificantly greater activation was observed in prefrontal cortices in controls compared with boys having fraX, who (in contrast) demonstrated elevated left insula activation to direct eye gaze stimuli. Furthermore, compared with controls, boys with fraX showed greater sensitization in the left amygdala with successive exposure to direct gaze.

conclusionsCompared with controls, boys with fraX display distinct patterns of brain activation in response to direct eye gaze. These results suggest that aberrant neural processing of direct eye gaze in subjects with fraX may be related to the associated avoidant response.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingNonverbal CommunicationAdolescentAmygdalaAttentionBrainBrain MappingCerebral CortexCross-Sectional StudiesDevelopmental DisabilitiesDominance, CerebralFaceFixation, OcularFragile X Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID18981343
PMCPMC4445973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.