Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18980695›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2008

Role of drug transporters and drug accumulation in the temporal acquisition of drug resistance.

Stacey L Hembruff, Monique L Laberge, David J Villeneuve, Baoqing Guo, Zachary Veitch, Melanie Cecchetto, Amadeo M Parissenti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Drug conjugates-an emerging approach to treat breast cancer.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stacey L HembruffRegional Cancer Program, Sudbury Regional Hospital, and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON Canada. shembruff@hrsrh.on.ca
Monique L Laberge
David J Villeneuve
Baoqing Guo
Zachary Veitch
Melanie Cecchetto
Amadeo M Parissenti
Sudbury Regional Hospital · CALaurentian University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthracyclines and taxanes are commonly used in the treatment of breast cancer. However, tumor resistance to these drugs often develops, possibly due to overexpression of drug transporters. It remains unclear whether drug resistance in vitro occurs at clinically relevant doses of chemotherapy drugs and whether both the onset and magnitude of drug resistance can be temporally and causally correlated with the enhanced expression and activity of specific drug transporters. To address these issues, MCF-7 cells were selected for survival in increasing concentrations of doxorubicin (MCF-7DOX-2), epirubicin (MCF-7EPI), paclitaxel (MCF-7TAX-2), or docetaxel (MCF-7TXT). During selection cells were assessed for drug sensitivity, drug uptake, and the expression of various drug transporters.

resultsIn all cases, resistance was only achieved when selection reached a specific threshold dose, which was well within the clinical range. A reduction in drug uptake was temporally correlated with the acquisition of drug resistance for all cell lines, but further increases in drug resistance at doses above threshold were unrelated to changes in cellular drug uptake. Elevated expression of one or more drug transporters was seen at or above the threshold dose, but the identity, number, and temporal pattern of drug transporter induction varied with the drug used as selection agent. The pan drug transporter inhibitor cyclosporin A was able to partially or completely restore drug accumulation in the drug-resistant cell lines, but had only partial to no effect on drug sensitivity. The inability of cyclosporin A to restore drug sensitivity suggests the presence of additional mechanisms of drug resistance.

conclusionThis study indicates that drug resistance is achieved in breast tumour cells only upon exposure to concentrations of drug at or above a specific selection dose. While changes in drug accumulation and the expression of drug transporters does occur at the threshold dose, the magnitude of resistance cannot be attributed solely to changes in drug accumulation or the activity of drug transporters. The identities of these additional drug-transporter-independent mechanisms are discussed, including their likely clinical relevance.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAnalysis of VarianceAntineoplastic AgentsATP-Binding Cassette, Sub-Family C ProteinsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2Cell Line, TumorCyclosporineDocetaxelDoxorubicinEpirubicinHumansMajor Vault ProteinMultidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2ABCB1 protein, humanABCC4 protein, humanABCG2 protein, humanAntineoplastic AgentsATP-Binding Cassette, Sub-Family C ProteinsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2CyclosporineDocetaxelDoxorubicinEpirubicinMajor Vault Proteinmultidrug resistance-associated protein 1Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2Neoplasm ProteinsPaclitaxelTaxoidsVault Ribonucleoprotein Particles

Identifiers

PMID18980695
PMCPMC2596802
OpenAlexW2098585473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.