ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Learning transcriptional regulatory networks from high throughput gene expression data using continuous three-way mutual information.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- TGPred: efficient methods for predicting target genes of a transcription factor by integrating statistics, machine learning and optimization.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Gene regulation network inference using k-nearest neighbor-based mutual information estimation: revisiting an old DREAM.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Current status and trends in forest genomics.Forestry research · 2022Review
- An order independent algorithm for inferring gene regulatory network using quantile value for conditional independence tests.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Construction of Condition-Specific Gene Regulatory Network Using Kernel Canonical Correlation Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Bayesian differential analysis of gene regulatory networks exploiting genetic perturbations.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Leveraging User-Friendly Network Approaches to Extract Knowledge From High-ThroughputFrontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Biologically anchored knowledge expansion approach uncovers KLF4 as a novel insulin signaling regulator.PloS one · 2018Article
- Detection of network motifs using three-way ANOVA.PloS one · 2018Article
- Data-driven reverse engineering of signaling pathways using ensembles of dynamic models.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Recursive random forest algorithm for constructing multilayered hierarchical gene regulatory networks that govern biological pathways.PloS one · 2017Article
- Identification of marginal causal relationships in gene networks from observational and interventional expression data.PloS one · 2017Article
- Inference of Gene Regulatory Network Based on Local Bayesian Networks.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Understanding transcriptional regulatory networks using computational models.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2016Review
- Bottom-up GGM algorithm for constructing multilayered hierarchical gene regulatory networks that govern biological pathways or processes.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Gene Regulatory Network Inferences Using a Maximum-Relevance and Maximum-Significance Strategy.PloS one · 2016Article
- Enabling network inference methods to handle missing data and outliers.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Integromics network meta-analysis on cardiac aging offers robust multi-layer modular signatures and reveals micronome synergism.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- A new asynchronous parallel algorithm for inferring large-scale gene regulatory networks.PloS one · 2015Article
- Modulation of gene expression regulated by the transcription factor NF-κB/RelA.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProbability based statistical learning methods such as mutual information and Bayesian networks have emerged as a major category of tools for reverse engineering mechanistic relationships from quantitative biological data. In this work we introduce a new statistical learning strategy, MI3 that addresses three common issues in previous methods simultaneously: (1) handling of continuous variables, (2) detection of more complex three-way relationships and (3) better differentiation of causal versus confounding relationships. With these improvements, we provide a more realistic representation of the underlying biological system.
resultsWe test the MI3 algorithm using both synthetic and experimental data. In the synthetic data experiment, MI3 achieved an absolute sensitivity/precision of 0.77/0.83 and a relative sensitivity/precision both of 0.99. In addition, MI3 significantly outperformed the control methods, including Bayesian networks, classical two-way mutual information and a discrete version of MI3. We then used MI3 and control methods to infer a regulatory network centered at the MYC transcription factor from a published microarray dataset. Models selected by MI3 were numerically and biologically distinct from those selected by control methods. Unlike control methods, MI3 effectively differentiated true causal models from confounding models. MI3 recovered major MYC cofactors, and revealed major mechanisms involved in MYC dependent transcriptional regulation, which are strongly supported by literature. The MI3 network showed that limited sets of regulatory mechanisms are employed repeatedly to control the expression of large number of genes.
conclusionOverall, our work demonstrates that MI3 outperforms the frequently used control methods, and provides a powerful method for inferring mechanistic relationships underlying biological and other complex systems. The MI3 method is implemented in R in the "mi3" package, available under the GNU GPL from http://sysbio.engin.umich.edu/~luow/downloads.php and from the R package archive CRAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.