ArticleJournal of molecular histology2008
Preincision complex-I from the excision nuclease reaction among cochlear spiral limbus and outer hair cells.
Article in Journal of molecular histology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gene Therapy: An Historical Overview for Familial Hearing Loss.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Noise Stress Abrogates Structure-Specific Endonucleases within the Mammalian Inner Ear.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Emerging and established therapies for chemotherapy-induced ototoxicity.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Review
- Real-time quantification of Xeroderma pigmentosum mRNA from the mammalian cochlea.Ear and hearing · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The excision nuclease reaction defends the genome from endogenous and exogenous mutagens. The rate-limiting step in the reaction is facilitated by preincision complex-1 (PIC-1). PIC-1 is maintained by xeroderma pigmentosum A and C (XPA and XPC) through protein-protein interactions and DNA binding. XPA and XPC exhibit high-affinity for DNA adducts from the anticancer molecule, cisplatin. Systemic cisplatin treatment results in ubiquitous DNA adducts in the cochlea. Cochleae harvested from patients treated with cisplatin reveal dead outer hair cells among normal spiral limbus cells. Such discrepancy, suggest differences in genome defense repertoire among cochlear cells. The purpose of this study was to use cisplatin as a stimulus to examine XPA and XPC immunoreactivity among outer hair cells and spiral limbus cells. Fischer344 rats were treated with either one or two cycles of cisplatin, where each cycle lasted four days and separated by a 10 day rest period. Cochleae were harvested after each treatment cycle and four days after the second treatment cycle then processed for immunohistochemistry. Unlike spiral limbus cells, outer hair cells failed to acclimate to the cisplatin treatment cycles by regulating XPA and XPC immunoreactivity. These results imply that outer hair cells may have a limited capacity to mobilize PIC-I beyond basal demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.