ArticleParasitology research2009
Detection of Cryptosporidium spp. from human faeces by PCR-RFLP, cloning and sequencing.
Article in Parasitology research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of real-time PCR for the identification of the endangered species Galemys pyrenaicus through faecal samples.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Presence of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia in water samples from Southeast Asia: towards an integrated water detection system.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2016Article
- Enteric protozoa in the developed world: a public health perspective.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we compared and validated a nested ABC polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay to amplify Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst wall protein (COWP) gene fragment with a previous nested PCR-RFLP method. When RFLP of COWP gene did not provide clear results, we further analysed samples by cloning and sequencing for species and genotype identification. ABC-PCR was performed on DNA extracted from human faecal samples collected in England where Cryptosporidium was previously detected by conventional methods. COWP gene amplification was successful for all specimens; RFLP analyses using both RsaI and AluI enzymes recognised 54/55 restriction profiles. Among these, 40 (72.7%) characteristic patterns were generated for C. parvum and six (10.9%) for Cryptosporidium hominis; four (7.3%) showed species mixtures, while the remaining four samples (7.3%) showed atypical genotypes. Cloning and sequencing of mixtures and atypical genotypes identified one C. parvum, one C. hominis and three Cryptosporidium meleagridis. Indeed, molecular tools improved PCR-RFLP results. In conclusion, this study showed that ABC-PCR-RFLP technique was quick, simple and specific. Cloning and sequencing were helpful in characterising mixtures or previously uncharacterised RFLP patterns. All these epidemiological findings are useful information for any preventive intervention to control disease diffusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.