Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18978750›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2008

Role of HLA in hematopoietic SCT.

J Nowak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Shedding a new light on the HLA matching.The Korean journal of hematology · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

J NowakLaboratory of Immunogenetics, Institute of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland. szpik@ihit.waw.pl
Instytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologi · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HLA disparity between hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor and recipient triggers T-cell and NK-cell allorecognition, and induces the GVHD, GVL effect and/or may cause an engraftment failure. This review will cover the scope of human genomic variation, the methods of HLA typing and interpretation of high-resolution HLA results. We describe the main subsets of related and unrelated HSC donors and outline the main aspects of HLA disparity and their effect on the outcome of the patients after allogeneic HSC transplantation (HSCT). The HLA match between HSCT donor and recipient is crucial, but for many patients a perfectly matched donor is not available. The HSCT from the alternative mismatched donor with one allele/antigen mismatch (9/10) can be as beneficial as a HSCT from a fully matched donor, especially in younger patients. For the remaining patients, the donors with permissive mismatches may be the option. The permissiveness depends not only on the potential adverse effect of the HLA mismatches, but also on the urgency of the transplantation, the desirable GVL effect and the potential efficacy of the alternative therapy available for the patient.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHLA AntigensLiving DonorsAge FactorsAllelesDonor SelectionGraft RejectionGraft vs Host DiseaseGraft vs Leukemia EffectHistocompatibility TestingHumansKiller Cells, NaturalT-LymphocytesTransplantation, HomologousHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID18978750
OpenAlexW1965479004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.