Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18978059›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2009

Trends in prokaryotic evolution revealed by comparison of closely related bacterial and archaeal genomes.

Pavel S Novichkov, Yuri I Wolf, Inna Dubchak, Eugene V Koonin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Why did some viruses evolve to be giants while others did not?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The heterogeneous selection landscape of genome evolution in prokaryotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution of gene order in prokaryotes is driven primarily by gene gain and loss.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluating the Safety ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic Diversity and Chromosomal Rearrangements inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Thermodynamics of evolution and the origin of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Comparative Genome Analysis of 'Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Weak selection on synonymous codons substantially inflatesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pavel S NovichkovNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Yuri I Wolf
Inna Dubchak
Eugene V Koonin

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to explore microevolutionary trends in bacteria and archaea, we constructed a data set of 41 alignable tight genome clusters (ATGCs). We show that the ratio of the medians of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rates (dN/dS) that is used as a measure of the purifying selection pressure on protein sequences is a stable characteristic of the ATGCs. In agreement with previous findings, parasitic bacteria, notwithstanding the sometimes dramatic genome shrinkage caused by gene loss, are typically subjected to relatively weak purifying selection, presumably owing to relatively small effective population sizes and frequent bottlenecks. However, no evidence of genome streamlining caused by strong selective pressure was found in any of the ATGCs. On the contrary, a significant positive correlation between the genome size, as well as gene size, and selective pressure was observed, although a variety of free-living prokaryotes with very close selective pressures span nearly the entire range of genome sizes. In addition, we examined the connections between the sequence evolution rate and other genomic features. Although gene order changes much faster than protein sequences during the evolution of prokaryotes, a strong positive correlation was observed between the "rearrangement distance" and the amino acid distance, suggesting that at least some of the events leading to genome rearrangement are subjected to the same type of selective constraints as the evolution of amino acid sequences.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialArchaeaBacillus anthracisBacteriaEscherichia coliGene RearrangementGenetic VariationPopulation DensitySelection, GeneticSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID18978059
PMCPMC2612427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.