Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18977767›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular research2009

Expression of skeletal but not cardiac Na+ channel isoform preserves normal conduction in a depolarized cardiac syncytium.

Lev Protas, Wen Dun, Zhiheng Jia, Jia Lu, Annalisa Bucchi, Sindhu Kumari, Ming Chen, Ira S Cohen, Michael R Rosen, Emilia Entcheva and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prokaryotic voltage-gated sodium channels are more effective than endogenous NaAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Gene therapies for arrhythmias in heart failure.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The road to biological pacing.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2011
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lev ProtasDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 630 West 168 Street, Room PH7West-318, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Wen Dun
Zhiheng Jia
Jia Lu
Annalisa Bucchi
Sindhu Kumari
Ming Chen
Ira S Cohen
Michael R Rosen
Emilia Entcheva
Richard B Robinson
Columbia University · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

Support CoreP01HL028958 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ROSEN, MICHAEL R. · 1985 to 2007
$17.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-28958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsReentrant arrhythmias often develop in the setting of myocardial infarction and ensuing slow propagation. Increased Na(+) channel expression could prevent or disrupt reentrant circuits by speeding conduction if channel availability is not limited by membrane depolarization within the diseased myocardium. We therefore asked if, in the setting of membrane depolarization, action potential (AP) upstroke and normal conduction can be better preserved by the expression of a Na(+) channel isoform with altered biophysical properties compared to the native cardiac Na(+) channel isoform, namely having a positively shifted, voltage-dependent inactivation. METHODS AND

resultsThe skeletal Na(+) channel isoform (SkM1) and the cardiac Na(+) channel isoform (Nav1.5) were expressed in newborn rat ventricular myocyte cultures with a point mutation introduced in Nav1.5 to increase tetrodotoxin (TTX) sensitivity so native and expressed currents could be distinguished. External K(+) was increased from 5.4 to 10 mmol/L to induce membrane depolarization. APs, Na(+) currents, and conduction velocity (CV) were measured. In control cultures, elevated K(+) significantly reduced AP upstroke ( approximately 75%) and CV ( approximately 25%). Expression of Nav1.5 did not protect AP upstroke from K(+) depolarization. In contrast, in SkM1 expressing cultures, high K(+) reduced AP upstroke <50% and conduction was not significantly reduced. In a simulated anatomical reentry setting (using a void), the angular velocity (AV) of induced reentry was faster and the excitable gap shorter in SkM1 cultures compared to control for both normal and high K(+).

conclusionExpression of SkM1 but not Nav1.5 preserves AP upstroke and CV in a K(+)-depolarized syncytium. The higher AV and shorter excitable gap observed during reentry excitation around a void in SkM1 cultures would be expected to facilitate reentry self-termination. SkM1 Na(+) channel expression represents a novel gene therapy for the treatment of reentrant arrhythmias.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornArrhythmias, CardiacCells, CulturedGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHeart VentriclesHumansMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMyocytes, CardiacNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPoint MutationPotassiumMuscle ProteinsNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPotassiumScn4a protein, ratSCN5A protein, humanScn5a protein, ratSodium Channel BlockersSodium ChannelsTetrodotoxin

Identifiers

PMID18977767
PMCPMC2639131
OpenAlexW2015172641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.