ArticleAnatomy and embryology1991
Observations on the development of ascending spinal pathways in the clawed toad, Xenopus laevis.
Article in Anatomy and embryology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of ascending spinal pathways has been studied in the clawed toad, Xenopus laevis. From stage 35 (hatching) on, HRP was applied at the spinomedullary border or to the area of the developing dorsal column nucleus, to analyze the development of ascending spinal pathways to the brain stem, and the onset and development of spinal projections to the dorsal column nucleus, respectively. Several populations of spinal neurons with ascending projections at least as far as the spinomedullary border were successively labeled. In early stages ascending spinal projections arise from Rohon-Beard cells and ascending interneuron populations located at the margin of the gray and white matter, i.e., marginal neurons. The ascending interneuron populations could be characterized as dorsolateral commissural and commissural interneurons projecting contralaterally, and as ipsilaterally projecting ascending interneurons and distinguished by Roberts and co-workers. Such a subdivision could be made until about stage 57. Then these ascending and commissural interneuron populations become intermingled with other populations of ascending tract neurons. Rohon-Beard cells could be labeled, more or less shrunken, until stage 55. Around stage 48 (at the time of the appearance of the limb buds) spinal ganglion cells could be labeled from the spinomedullary border and the developing dorsal column nucleus. At stage 48 such ascending primary spinal afferents were found to arise only from non-limb-bud-innervating dorsal root ganglia. Gradually also the limb-bud-innervating ganglia give rise to ascending collaterals, so that by stage 53 all spinal ganglia send ascending collaterals to the brain stem. The number of cells of origin of secondary spinal afferents to the brain stem increases during development, and their distribution becomes more extensive. Particularly impressive is a large population of neurons in the dorsal horn projecting ipsilaterally to the dorsal column nucleus. Part of the latter population represents non-primary spinal afferents to the dorsal column nucleus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1897746What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.