Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18974845›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biological sciences2008

Comparing methods of detection and quantitation of RNA editing of rat glycine receptor alpha3.

Aya Nakae, Tatsuya Tanaka, Keiko Miyake, Makiko Hase, Takashi Mashimo

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biological sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RNA Editing as a General Trait of Ebolaviruses.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. An RNA editing fingerprint of cancer stem cell reprogramming.Journal of translational medicine · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aya NakaeDepartment of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, Japan. anakae@anes.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
Tatsuya Tanaka
Keiko Miyake
Makiko Hase
Takashi Mashimo
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, it has become evident that RNA editing-related changes are important in the modulation of neuronal information processing. Alternatively edited transcripts, when meagerly present, are hard to detect. Significant functional consequences may result, however, from small differences in editing efficiency. Moreover, it is difficult to evaluate the ratio of edited transcripts. The glycine receptor alpha3 subunit (GlyR alpha3) is expressed in the spinal cord, and transcripts of GlyR alpha3 are susceptible to RNA editing. The physiological role of this editing is still unclear. To analyze changes in RNA editing in various animal models, we need reliable and practical ways to detect and quantitate GlyR alpha3 RNA editing.

resultsWe identified and assessed different ways of detecting edited RNA transcripts, including direct sequencing, denaturing high performance chromatography (DHPLC), allele-specific real-time PCR with TaqMan probes, and PCR with allele-specific primers. Using PCR with allele-specific primers on standard PCR products for edited and nonedited GlyR alpha3, we were able to detect as little as a 0.5% incidence of edited transcripts. We were able to detect a 5% incidence of RNA editing using direct sequencing and 2% using DHPLC. We could accurately determine the ratio of edited to non-edited RNA using DHPLC, direct sequencing, and allele-specific real-time PCR with TaqMan probes.

conclusionWe demonstrated exact and sensitive methods of detecting RNA editing. In prepared samples, we showed means of quantitating the incidence of editing of a particular site. The demonstrated methodologies should be very useful when extended to the evaluation of other types of RNA editing and single base mutations.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidRNA EditingSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsCloning, MolecularDNA PrimersPolymerase Chain ReactionRatsReceptors, GlycineRegression AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificityDNA Primersglycine receptor alpha3 subunitReceptors, Glycineallele-specific primerallele-specific TaqMan PCR methodDHPLCdirect sequencingglycine alpha 3 subunitRNA editing

Identifiers

PMID18974845
PMCPMC2575349
OpenAlexW2119682655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.