Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18974125›Full record

ArticleCancer research2008

Routine diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased frequency of chromosome translocations among U.S. radiologic technologists.

Alice J Sigurdson, Parveen Bhatti, Dale L Preston, Michele Morin Doody, Diane Kampa, Bruce H Alexander, Dayton Petibone, Lee C Yong, Alan A Edwards, Elaine Ron and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alice J SigurdsonDepartment of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. sigurdsa@mail.nih.gov
Parveen Bhatti
Dale L Preston
Michele Morin Doody
Diane Kampa
Bruce H Alexander
Dayton Petibone
Lee C Yong
Alan A Edwards
Elaine Ron
James D Tucker
National Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Minnesota · USWayne State University · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · US

Funding

Studies of Populations Exposed to Occupational Sources of RadiationZIACP010133 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI KITAHARA, CARI · 2009 to 2025
$34.2M
STUDIES ON POPULATIONS EXPOSED TO OCCUPATIONAL SOURCES OF RADIATIONZ01CP010133 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI LINET, MARTHA S. · 1996 to 2008
$2.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. population has nearly one radiographic examination per person per year, and concern about cancer risks associated with medical radiation has increased. Radiologic technologists were surveyed to determine whether their personal cumulative exposure to diagnostic X-rays was associated with increased frequencies of chromosome translocations, an established radiation biomarker and possible intermediary suggesting increased cancer risk. Within a large cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists, 150 provided a blood sample for whole chromosome painting and were interviewed about past X-ray examinations. The number and types of examinations reported were converted to a red bone marrow (RBM) dose score with units that approximated 1 mGy. The relationship between dose score and chromosome translocation frequency was assessed using Poisson regression. The estimated mean cumulative RBM radiation dose score was 49 (range, 0-303). After adjustment for age, translocation frequencies significantly increased with increasing RBM dose score with an estimate of 0.004 translocations per 100 cell equivalents per score unit (95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.007; P < 0.001). Removing extreme values or adjustment for gender, cigarette smoking, occupational radiation dose, allowing practice X-rays while training, work with radioisotopes, and radiotherapy for benign conditions did not affect the estimate. Cumulative radiation exposure from routine X-ray examinations was associated independently with increased chromosome damage, suggesting the possibility of elevated long-term health risks, including cancer. The slope estimate was consistent with expectation based on cytogenetic experience and atomic bomb survivor data.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureTechnology, RadiologicTranslocation, GeneticAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleUnited StatesWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID18974125
PMCPMC2586176
OpenAlexW2041134140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.