Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18973690›Full record

SynthesisGenome biology2008

Boolean implication networks derived from large scale, whole genome microarray datasets.

Debashis Sahoo, David L Dill, Andrew J Gentles, Robert Tibshirani, Sylvia K Plevritis

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Genome biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. C1QA is an invariant biomarker for tissue macrophages.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Artificial intelligence-guided discovery of gastric cancer continuum.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. CDX2 Biomarker Testing and Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: An Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2022
    Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Debashis SahooDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
David L Dill
Andrew J Gentles
Robert Tibshirani
Sylvia K Plevritis

Funding

Computational Modeling of Cancer BiologyU56CA112973 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2004 to 2009
$2.9M
Application of Boolean Networks to discover stem and progenitor cellsK99CA151673 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAHOO, DEBASHIS · 2011 to 2012
$304k
NCI NIH HHS 5U56CA112973NCI NIH HHS K99 CA151673NCI NIH HHS U56 CA112973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a method for extracting Boolean implications (if-then relationships) in very large amounts of gene expression microarray data. A meta-analysis of data from thousands of microarrays for humans, mice, and fruit flies finds millions of implication relationships between genes that would be missed by other methods. These relationships capture gender differences, tissue differences, development, and differentiation. New relationships are discovered that are preserved across all three species.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomeAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPattern Recognition, Automated

Identifiers

PMID18973690
PMCPMC2760884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.