Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18973398›Full record

ReviewDrugs2008

Etravirine.

Emma D Deeks, Gillian M Keating

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A review of the toxicity of HIV medications.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Rilpivirine.Drugs · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma D DeeksWolters Kluwer Health, Adis, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Gillian M Keating
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZWolters Kluwer Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Etravirine is a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that demonstrates potent in vitro activity against wild-type strains of HIV type 1 (HIV-1), as well as against numerous strains resistant to available NNRTIs. Furthermore, the potential for resistance to etravirine developing appears to be lower than for first-generation NNRTIs. In treatment-experienced patients infected with HIV-1 with NNRTI resistance, HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/mL (primary endpoint) and <400 copies/mL were achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving etravirine 200 mg twice daily plus background therapy (BT) than placebo plus BT, according to the planned pooled and individual 24-week analyses of two large, well designed, continuing phase III trials (DUET-1 and DUET-2). In the pooled 24-week analysis, patients receiving etravirine plus BT achieved a significantly greater mean reduction in viral load from baseline and a significantly greater mean increase in CD4+ cell counts from baseline than patients receiving placebo plus BT. The pooled and individual findings of the DUET studies at 48 weeks indicate that the efficacy of etravirine is maintained with regard to these endpoints. In the DUET studies, etravirine was generally well tolerated in treatment-experienced patients infected with HIV-1, with a tolerability profile generally similar to that of placebo. Adverse events were mostly of mild or moderate severity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsClinical Trials as TopicHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansNitrilesPyridazinesPyrimidinesReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsAnti-HIV AgentsetravirineNitrilesPyridazinesPyrimidinesReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID18973398
OpenAlexW3189799714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.