ReviewDrugs2008
Bivalirudin: in patients with acute coronary syndromes : planned for urgent or early intervention.
Review in Drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- BMI differences on anticoagulation with bivalirudin vs. heparin during primary PCI: a BRIGHT-4 subanalysis.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Bivalirudin: a pharmacoeconomic profile of its use in patients with acute coronary syndromes.PharmacoEconomics · 2011Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bivalirudin is a 20-amino acid synthetic polypeptide that directly inhibits both fibrin-bound and soluble thrombin. In a randomized, open-label, phase III study (ACUITY) in 13,819 patients with acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) in whom urgent or early intervention was planned, both bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor and bivalirudin alone were noninferior to heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor for the primary endpoint of composite ischaemia (myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization or death from any cause) at 30 days. The primary endpoint of major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass graft surgery had occurred in significantly fewer recipients of bivalirudin alone than of heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor after 30 days. Bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was noninferior to the heparin regimen with regard to this bleeding event. Bivalirudin alone was also associated with a significantly lower incidence of the primary net clinical outcome endpoint (composite ischaemia or major bleeding) after 30 days. Bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was noninferior to the heparin regimen with regard to this endpoint. The findings of ACUITY at 1 year indicate that both bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and bivalirudin alone were as effective as heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor with regard to the long-term incidence of composite ischaemia and all-cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.