ReviewDrugs2008
Variceal bleeding : pharmacological treatment and prophylactic strategies.
Review in Drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Portosystemic shunts versus endoscopic intervention with or without medical treatment for prevention of rebleeding in people with cirrhosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Fasting for haemostasis in children with gastrointestinal bleeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Sequential endoscopic treatment for esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding significantly reduces patient mortality and rebleeding rates.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Influence of variceal bleeding on natural history of ACLF and management options.Hepatology international · 2016Review
- Addition of Somatostatin After Successful Endoscopic Variceal Ligation Does not Prevent Early Rebleeding in Comparison to Placebo: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology · 2015Article
- Endoscopic hemostasis techniques for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oesophageal varices and ascites may develop when the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) increases above 10 mmHg, and variceal bleeding may occur when the HVPG rises above 12 mmHg. Pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension may prevent bleeding by reducing the HVPG below 12 mmHg. Even if this threshold level is not reached, the risk of bleeding decreases markedly with reductions in HVPG that are >20% from baseline.Endoscopic therapy is a local treatment that prevents bleeding by obliterating the varices, and has no effect on the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to portal hypertension and variceal rupture. When used together, both pharmacological and endoscopic therapies may have an additive effect, which has been demonstrated in different clinical settings. In acute oesophageal variceal bleeding, vasoactive drugs (either terlipressin or somatostatin) should be started as soon as possible (before diagnostic endoscopy) and maintained for 2-5 days. The efficacy of pharmacotherapy is improved with the addition of emergency endoscopic therapy. Adding endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) improves the efficacy and safety achieved with the combination of emergency sclerotherapy and vasoactive drugs. Antibacterial prophylaxis should be an integral part of therapy in acute bleeding.To prevent rebleeding, both EVL and the combination of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) and isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) may be a valid first-line choice. Adding beta-blockers improves the efficacy of EVL alone. Haemodynamic responders to beta-blockers with or without ISMN (i.e. those with a decrease in HVPG to <12 mmHg or by >20% of baseline) have a reduction in the risk of haemorrhage to below 10% of patients and, consequently, will not need further treatment, while rescue therapies should be provided to nonresponders. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts are the recommended rescue therapy when EVL and/or beta-blockers with or without ISMN fail. beta-Blockers significantly reduce the risk of a first haemorrhage in patients with large varices and improve survival. Compared with beta-blockers, EVL reduces the risk of first bleeding without any differences in mortality and should be offered to patients with large varices who have contraindications or an intolerance to beta-blockers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.