ReviewDrugs2008
Double-boosted protease inhibitor antiretroviral regimens: what role?
Review in Drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of a dual boosted protease inhibitor-based regimen, atazanavir and fosamprenavir/ritonavir, against HIV: experience in a pediatric population.BMC infectious diseases · 2012Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Antiretroviral Therapy for Multidrug-Resistant HIV: Past, Present, and Future.AIDS research and treatment · 2012Article
- Outcomes of patients on dual-boosted PI regimens: experience of the Swiss HIV cohort study.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the clinical benefit observed with early highly active antiretroviral therapy, its toxicity and inconvenience, and the strategy of sequentially adding newly available drugs to failing regimens meant that for many patients, it was difficult to build an effective regimen soon after starting therapy. In this setting, the idea of using double-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) to build a potent regimen emerged. The rationale for the simultaneous use of two PIs is (i) to provide synergistic or additive activity against HIV; (ii) to achieve higher plasma concentrations of both PIs with only one booster; (iii) to increase the genetic barrier to resistance; and/or (iv) to avoid toxicity with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimens.Double-boosted PI strategies are not recommended in treatment-naive patients because of their low success rate and the availability of more convenient and effective regimens.There are no adequate trials in treatment-experienced patients to establish the clinical efficacy of double-boosted PI regimens; however, the published non-comparative studies suggest considerable efficacy with certain combinations (e.g. lopinavir/ritonavir plus atazanavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir and others) in patients in whom a conventional regimen with one boosted PI could have little chance of success.New drugs of old and new classes that are better tolerated and have different resistance profiles have become available in recent years. These drugs have demonstrated their efficacy in randomized clinical trials, even in patients with extensive treatment experience and high drug resistance. Nowadays, in almost all patients, it is possible to elaborate a regimen with three active drugs, achieving success rates similar to those obtained in treatment-naive patients with recommended regimens. In this context, it is unthinkable that double-boosted PIs could play any role.Double-boosted PIs may be an alternative for those patients with limited therapeutic options in resource-poor settings, where new expensive drugs are not currently available. The fixed combination of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets makes it easier to boost with another PI at the same time, without requiring ritonavir refrigeration, and this may be particularly useful in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.