Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18973392›Full record

ReviewDrugs2008

Double-boosted protease inhibitor antiretroviral regimens: what role?

Esteban Ribera, Adrian Curran

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esteban RiberaInfectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. eribera@vhebron.net
Adrian Curran
Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the clinical benefit observed with early highly active antiretroviral therapy, its toxicity and inconvenience, and the strategy of sequentially adding newly available drugs to failing regimens meant that for many patients, it was difficult to build an effective regimen soon after starting therapy. In this setting, the idea of using double-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) to build a potent regimen emerged. The rationale for the simultaneous use of two PIs is (i) to provide synergistic or additive activity against HIV; (ii) to achieve higher plasma concentrations of both PIs with only one booster; (iii) to increase the genetic barrier to resistance; and/or (iv) to avoid toxicity with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimens.Double-boosted PI strategies are not recommended in treatment-naive patients because of their low success rate and the availability of more convenient and effective regimens.There are no adequate trials in treatment-experienced patients to establish the clinical efficacy of double-boosted PI regimens; however, the published non-comparative studies suggest considerable efficacy with certain combinations (e.g. lopinavir/ritonavir plus atazanavir, lopinavir/ritonavir plus saquinavir and others) in patients in whom a conventional regimen with one boosted PI could have little chance of success.New drugs of old and new classes that are better tolerated and have different resistance profiles have become available in recent years. These drugs have demonstrated their efficacy in randomized clinical trials, even in patients with extensive treatment experience and high drug resistance. Nowadays, in almost all patients, it is possible to elaborate a regimen with three active drugs, achieving success rates similar to those obtained in treatment-naive patients with recommended regimens. In this context, it is unthinkable that double-boosted PIs could play any role.Double-boosted PIs may be an alternative for those patients with limited therapeutic options in resource-poor settings, where new expensive drugs are not currently available. The fixed combination of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets makes it easier to boost with another PI at the same time, without requiring ritonavir refrigeration, and this may be particularly useful in this setting.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveClinical Trials as TopicDrug Therapy, CombinationHIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansHIV Protease Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID18973392
OpenAlexW161759410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.