Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18972101›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2009

Management of invasive candidiasis and candidemia in adult non-neutropenic intensive care unit patients: Part I. Epidemiology and diagnosis.

Benoît P Guery, Maiken C Arendrup, Georg Auzinger, Elie Azoulay, Márcio Borges Sá, Elizabeth M Johnson, Eckhard Müller, Christian Putensen, Coleman Rotstein, Gabriele Sganga and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia/invasive candidiasis in selected critically ill patients.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2012
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Treatment Practices for Adults With Candidemia at 9 Active Surveillance Sites-United States, 2017-2018.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation of the updated "Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. InvasiveJournal of pediatric intensive care · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Impact of empirical treatment with antifungal agents on survival of patients with candidemia.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Benoît P GueryInfectious Diseases, SGRIVI, Hopital Huriez, CHRU Lille, 59045, Lille Cedex, France.
Maiken C Arendrup
Georg Auzinger
Elie Azoulay
Márcio Borges Sá
Elizabeth M Johnson
Eckhard Müller
Christian Putensen
Coleman Rotstein
Gabriele Sganga
Mario Venditti
Rafael Zaragoza Crespo
Bart Jan Kullberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive candidiasis and candidemia are frequently encountered in the nosocomial setting, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). OBJECTIVES AND

methodsTo review the current management of invasive candidiasis and candidemia in non-neutropenic adult ICU patients based on a review of the literature and a European expert panel discussion. RESULTS AND

conclusionsCandida albicans remains the most frequently isolated fungal species followed by C. glabrata. The diagnosis of invasive candidiasis involves both clinical and laboratory parameters, but neither of these are specific. One of the main features in diagnosis is the evaluation of risk factor for infection which will identify patients in need of pre-emptive or empiric treatment. Clinical scores were built from those risk factors. Among laboratory diagnosis, a positive blood culture from a normally sterile site provides positive evidence. Surrogate markers have also been proposed like 1,3 beta-D: glucan level, mannans, or PCR testing. Invasive candidiasis and candidemia is a growing concern in the ICU, apart from cases with positive blood cultures or fluid/tissue biopsy, diagnosis is neither sensitive nor specific. The diagnosis remains difficult and is usually based on the evaluation of risk factors.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsBiomarkersCandidiasisCross InfectionEuropeFungemiaHumansPrevalenceTurkeyBiomarkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.