Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18971349›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2008

Sex differences in the developmental origins of hypertension and cardiorenal disease.

Jeffrey S Gilbert, Mark J Nijland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeffrey S GilbertDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Medical School-Duluth, Duluth, MN 55812, USA. jgilbert@d.umn.edu
Mark J Nijland

Funding

PARTURITION AND FETAL PRIMATE HYPOTHALAMIC FUNCTIONP01HD021350 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI JANSSON, THOMAS · 1987 to 2018
$19.9M
Renal and Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Hypertension and PregnancyF32HL090269 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI GILBERT, JEFFREY S · 2007 to 2007
$44k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL090269NICHD NIH HHS HD 21350NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD021350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "developmental origins of health and disease" (DOHAD) hypothesis derives from clinical observations, indicating long-term health consequences for persons of low birth weight. There is growing evidence, primarily from animal studies, that supports the idea that processes put in motion during development that contribute to DOHAD do not necessarily reflect as significantly compromised growth and altered birth weight. Throughout the body of work investigating the DOHAD hypothesis, several themes have emerged; the importance of the placenta, the presence of critical periods of vulnerability, the involvement of the kidney in programmed hypertension, the presence of sex differences in the progression and development of adult diseases. Despite compelling findings in recent studies, much remains unclear regarding the impact of biological sex in the progression of human diseases, in general, and in the mechanisms underlying developmentally programmed responses, in particular. Although the contribution of biological sex to DOHAD is increasingly recognized, it also appears that it may exert distinctly different influences during fetal and adult life. The mechanisms by which biological sex contributes to these processes remains nebulous at present; nevertheless, several intriguing mechanistic candidates have been proposed ranging from differences in the amounts of sex hormones (e.g., estrogens, androgens) to recently described sexual dimorphism in the transcriptome of a variety of mammalian tissues. Recognizing the influences of biological sex or sex hormones on DOHAD uniquely situates research in this area to provide significant insights into the development and progression of many diseases, recent examples of which are the subject of this review.

Indexed as

AnimalsBirth WeightDisease ProgressionEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFood DeprivationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGonadal Steroid HormonesHeart DiseasesHumansHypertensionKidney DiseasesMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPlacental CirculationPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsGonadal Steroid Hormones

Identifiers

PMID18971349
PMCPMC2685301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.