Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18958630›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2008

Terminology for neuroscience data discovery: multi-tree syntax and investigator-derived semantics.

Daniel Gardner, David H Goldberg, Bernice Grafstein, Adrian Robert, Esther P Gardner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Perspective on Neuroscience Data Standardization with Neurodata Without Borders.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel GardnerLaboratory of Neuroinformatics and Department of Physiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. dan@med.cornell.edu
David H Goldberg
Bernice Grafstein
Adrian Robert
Esther P Gardner

Funding

NEURAL MECHANISMS OF CUTANEOUS SPATIAL INTEGRATIONR01NS011862 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GARDNER, ESTHER P. · 1985 to 2014
$5.7M
SOMATOSENSORY CORTICAL NEURON PHYSIOLOGY: A WEB DATABASER01MH057153 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GARDNER, DANIEL · 1996 to 2009
$4.2M
Algorithms and Informatics for Analysis of Neural CodingR01MH068012 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GARDNER, DANIEL · 2004 to 2007
$2.0M
NEUROINFORMATICS AND EYE-HAND COORDINATIONR01NS044820 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GARDNER, ESTHER P. · 2002 to 2005
$1.6M
Neural Mechanisms of Cutaneous Spatial IntegrationR56NS011862 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GARDNER, ESTHER P. · 2008 to 2008
$500k
NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271200577531CNIMHD NIH HHS 263-MD-409125-1NIMH NIH HHS MH57153NIMH NIH HHS MH68012NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH057153NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068012NINDS NIH HHS NS44820NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS011862NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044820NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS011862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Neuroscience Information Framework (NIF), developed for the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research and available at http://nif.nih.gov and http://neurogateway.org , is built upon a set of coordinated terminology components enabling data and web-resource description and selection. Core NIF terminologies use a straightforward syntax designed for ease of use and for navigation by familiar web interfaces, and readily exportable to aid development of relational-model databases for neuroscience data sharing. Datasets, data analysis tools, web resources, and other entities are characterized by multiple descriptors, each addressing core concepts, including data type, acquisition technique, neuroanatomy, and cell class. Terms for each concept are organized in a tree structure, providing is-a and has-a relations. Broad general terms near each root span the category or concept and spawn more detailed entries for specificity. Related but distinct concepts (e.g., brain area and depth) are specified by separate trees, for easier navigation than would be required by graph representation. Semantics enabling NIF data discovery were selected at one or more workshops by investigators expert in particular systems (vision, olfaction, behavioral neuroscience, neurodevelopment), brain areas (cerebellum, thalamus, hippocampus), preparations (molluscs, fly), diseases (neurodegenerative disease), or techniques (microscopy, computation and modeling, neurogenetics). Workshop-derived integrated term lists are available Open Source at http://brainml.org ; a complete list of participants is at http://brainml.org/workshops.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicAccess to InformationAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases as TopicHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetMeta-Analysis as TopicNeurosciencesSemanticsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID18958630
PMCPMC2663521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.