ArticleDer Anaesthesist2008
[Endovascular or surface cooling?: therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTime course, time necessary to achieve the target temperature and stable maintenance, as well as a controlled rewarming period are important factors influencing the outcome of patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
methodsAfter successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation a total of 49 patients were cooled via an endovascular or external cooling device to a target temperature of 33 degrees C. Relevant cooling parameters, such as time between admission and initiation of cooling, achievement of target temperature and stable maintenance of cooling therapy, were compared between both groups.
resultsIn the endovascular cooling group the target temperature was reached significantly faster (154 +/- 97 min vs. 268 +/- 95 min, p = 0.0002) and showed stable and controlled maintenance of cooling therapy (deviation from target temperature: 0.189 +/- 0.23 degrees C vs 0.596 +/- 0.61 degrees C, p = 0.00006). The rewarming phase was better controlled and length of ICU stay was shorter in the group with endovascular cooling (8.8 +/- 3 vs. 12.9 +/- 6 days).
conclusionEndovascular cooling offers the possibility to reach the target temperature significantly faster and a stable maintenance of therapeutic hypothermia. It is capable of a more controlled rewarming period and shortens the length of ICU stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18958431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.