ArticlePloS one2008
Patterns of hybrid loss of imprinting reveal tissue- and cluster-specific regulation.
Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybridization and gene expression: Beyond differentially expressed genes.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- United by conflict: Convergent signatures of parental conflict in angiosperms and placental mammals.The Journal of heredity · 2024Review
- Presence of H3K4me3 on Paternally Expressed Genes of the Paternal Genome From Sperm to Implantation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Blood transcriptome analysis in a buck-ewe hybrid and its parents.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Effects of maternal nutrition on the expression of genomic imprinted genes in ovine fetuses.Epigenetics · 2018Article
- Genomic imprinting, disrupted placental expression, and speciation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2016Article
- Parent-of-origin growth effects and the evolution of hybrid inviability in dwarf hamsters.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2014Article
- Imprinted gene expression in hybrids: perturbed mechanisms and evolutionary implications.Heredity · 2014Review
- Natural genetic variation underlying differences in Peromyscus repetitive and social/aggressive behaviors.Behavior genetics · 2014Article
- Peromyscus as a Mammalian epigenetic model.Genetics research international · 2012Article
- Chromatin evolution and molecular drive in speciation.International journal of evolutionary biology · 2012Article
- Aberrant growth and pattern formation in Peromyscus hybrid placental development.Biology of reproduction · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCrosses between natural populations of two species of deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus (BW), and P. polionotus (PO), produce parent-of-origin effects on growth and development. BW females mated to PO males (bwxpo) produce growth-retarded but otherwise healthy offspring. In contrast, PO females mated to BW males (POxBW) produce overgrown and severely defective offspring. The hybrid phenotypes are pronounced in the placenta and include POxBW conceptuses which lack embryonic structures. Evidence to date links variation in control of genomic imprinting with the hybrid defects, particularly in the POxBW offspring. Establishment of genomic imprinting is typically mediated by gametic DNA methylation at sites known as gDMRs. However, imprinted gene clusters vary in their regulation by gDMR sequences. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsHere we further assess imprinted gene expression and DNA methylation at different cluster types in order to discern patterns. These data reveal POxBW misexpression at the Kcnq1ot1 and Peg3 clusters, both of which lose ICR methylation in placental tissues. In contrast, some embryonic transcripts (Peg10, Kcnq1ot1) reactivated the silenced allele with little or no loss of DNA methylation. Hybrid brains also display different patterns of imprinting perturbations. Several cluster pairs thought to use analogous regulatory mechanisms are differentially affected in the hybrids. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data reinforce the hypothesis that placental and somatic gene regulation differs significantly, as does that between imprinted gene clusters and between species. That such epigenetic regulatory variation exists in recently diverged species suggests a role in reproductive isolation, and that this variation is likely to be adaptive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.