Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18957380›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2009

Review. Proton-coupled gating in chloride channels.

Jirí Lísal, Merritt Maduke

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Helix O modulates voltage dependency of CLC-1.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A thin line between channels and pumps.Biophysical journal · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Introduction. The blurred boundary between channels and transporters.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jirí LísalDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Merritt Maduke
Stanford University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of CIC Chloride Transport ProteinsR01GM070773 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MADUKE, MERRITT C · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070773NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM070773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physiologically indispensable chloride channel (CLC) family is split into two classes of membrane proteins: chloride channels and chloride/proton antiporters. In this article we focus on the relationship between these two groups and specifically review the role of protons in chloride-channel gating. Moreover, we discuss the evidence for proton transport through the chloride channels and explore the possible pathways that the protons could take through the chloride channels. We present results of a mutagenesis study, suggesting the feasibility of one of the pathways, which is closely related to the proton pathway proposed previously for the chloride/proton antiporters. We conclude that the two groups of CLC proteins, although in principle very different, employ similar mechanisms and pathways for ion transport.

Indexed as

Chloride ChannelsChloridesIon Channel GatingProtonsChloride ChannelsChloridesProtons

Identifiers

PMID18957380
PMCPMC2674089
OpenAlexW2124994204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.