Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18957331›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2008

RNA in motion.

Kathleen B Hall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Journal of molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Target-Directed Approaches for Screening Small Molecules against RNA Targets.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dynamics of riboswitches: Molecular simulations.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Functional role of ribosomal signatures.Biophysical journal · 2010
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kathleen B HallDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. kathleenhal@gmail.com

Funding

MOLECULAR RECOGNITION OF RNA BY THE HUMAN U1A PROTEINR01GM046318 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HALL, KATHLEEN B · 1998 to 2007
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046318NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM046318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although RNA duplex regions are highly structured and inflexible, other elements of an RNA molecule are capable of dynamic motions. These flexible regions are the sites of interactions with small molecules, proteins, and other RNAs, yet there are few descriptions of these regions that include the timescale and amplitude of their motions. No one technique is sufficient to accurately describe these motions, but the combination of in vitro methods, particularly NMR relaxation methods, and more robust in silico methods, is beginning to yield the type of data that can be used to understand RNA function. Very few RNAs have been described by both techniques, and here one such RNA and one RNA:protein complex are reviewed.

Indexed as

MovementBase SequenceMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID18957331
PMCPMC2646008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.