Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18957200›Full record

ArticleCell2008

The P. furiosus mre11/rad50 complex promotes 5' strand resection at a DNA double-strand break.

Ben B Hopkins, Tanya T Paull

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Open biology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben B HopkinsThe Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Tanya T Paull
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Mrell/Rad50/Nbs1 and DNA double strand break repairR01CA094008 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI PAULL, TANYA T · 2002 to 2011
$2.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS R01 CA094008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mre11/Rad50 complex has been implicated in the early steps of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair through homologous recombination in several organisms. However, the enzymatic properties of this complex are incompatible with the generation of 3' single-stranded DNA for recombinase loading and strand exchange. In thermophilic archaea, the Mre11 and Rad50 genes cluster in an operon with genes encoding a helicase, HerA, and a 5' to 3' exonuclease, NurA, suggesting a common function. Here we show that purified Mre11 and Rad50 from Pyrococcus furiosus act cooperatively with HerA and NurA to resect the 5' strand at a DNA end under physiological conditions in vitro. The 3' single-stranded DNA generated by these enzymes can be utilized by the archaeal RecA homolog RadA to catalyze strand exchange. This work elucidates how the conserved Mre11/Rad50 complex promotes DNA end resection in archaea and may serve as a model for DSB processing in eukaryotes.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairArchaeal ProteinsDNAEndodeoxyribonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesMultienzyme ComplexesProtein Interaction MappingPyrococcus furiosusArchaeal ProteinsDNAEndodeoxyribonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesMre11 protein, archaealMultienzyme ComplexesRad50 protein, archaeal

Identifiers

PMID18957200
PMCPMC2581932
OpenAlexW2059168612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.