ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2008
Variability in recovery from aphasia.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- White Matter Hyperintensities as a Predictor of Aphasia Recovery.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024Trial
- Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on neural processing in post-stroke aphasia.Human brain mapping · 2017Trial
- Preservation and modulation of specific left hemisphere regions is vital for treated recovery from anomia in stroke.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010Trial
- Language comprehension in chronic aphasia relies on the language network, not the Multiple Demand network.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The nonlinear trajectory of post-stroke aphasia recovery.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Preliminary validation of the Bulgarian SCCAN: initial reliability, validity, and screening accuracy across neurological populations.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Exploring Language Recovery Pattern in Persons with Aphasia Across Acute and Sub-Acute Stages.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Predictions of Recovery in Bilingual Poststroke Aphasia: Aligning Insights With Clinical Evidence.Stroke · 2025Article
- EEG reveals brain network alterations in chronic aphasia during natural speech listening.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Online Eye Tracking for Aphasia: A Feasibility Study Comparing Web and Lab Tracking and Implications for Clinical Use.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Defining Trajectories of Linguistic, Cognitive-Communicative, and Quality of Life Outcomes in Aphasia: Longitudinal Observational Study Protocol.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024Article
- Investigating Aphasia Recovery: Demographic and Clinical Factors.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Unraveling the Thread of Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Translational Cognitive Perspective.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Diabetes, brain health, and treatment gains in post-stroke aphasia.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- A Scoping Review on the Effects of Emotional Stimuli on Language Processing in People With Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- The Dutch Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS-NL): psychometric properties in Flemish stroke survivors.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy.Journal of stroke · 2022Review
- Young Adults With Acquired Brain Injury Show Longitudinal Improvements in Cognition After Intensive Cognitive Rehabilitation.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Reliability and validity for perceptual flexibility in speech.Brain and language · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinicians have long recognized the enormous variability of recovery among patients with aphasia. Accordingly, the identification of specific factors most important in determining the extent of recovery has been the subject of many investigations. Yet, the reasons for two patients of the same age, nearly identical clinical presentations, and similar MRI findings having completely dissimilar recoveries are still unknown. It remains difficult for a clinician to make a valid prognosis of language recovery in an individual patient. This article provides a review of aphasia-recovery research and a framework for approaching the variability of recovery in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18957187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.