Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18957049›Full record

ArticleXenotransplantation

Proteomic identification of non-Gal antibody targets after pig-to-primate cardiac xenotransplantation.

Guerard W Byrne, Paul G Stalboerger, Eduardo Davila, Carrie J Heppelmann, Mozammel H Gazi, Hugh C J McGregor, Peter T LaBreche, William R Davies, Vinay P Rao, Keiji Oi and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Pig Lung Xenotransplantation: Barriers on the Road to Clinical Translation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Progress in Preclinical Models and Prospects for Clinical Translation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Lung xenotransplantation: a review.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Recent investigations into pig antigen and anti-pig antibody expression.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guerard W ByrneDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. byrne.guerard@mayo.edu
Paul G Stalboerger
Eduardo Davila
Carrie J Heppelmann
Mozammel H Gazi
Hugh C J McGregor
Peter T LaBreche
William R Davies
Vinay P Rao
Keiji Oi
Henry D Tazelaar
John S Logan
Christopher G A McGregor
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Studies in pig-to-primate cardiac xenotransplantationU01AI066310 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MCGREGOR, CHRISTOPHER G.A. · 2005 to 2014
$9.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI66310NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI066310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperience with non-antigenic galactose alpha1,3 galactose (alphaGal) polymers and development of alphaGal deficient pigs has reduced or eliminated the significance of this antigen in xenograft rejection. Despite these advances, delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) continues to occur most likely due to antibody responses to non-Gal endothelial cell (EC) antigens.

methodsTo gauge the diversity of the non-Gal antibody response we used antibody derived from CD46 transgenic heterotopic cardiac xenografts performed without T-cell immunosuppression, Group A (n = 4) and Gal knockout (GT-KO) heart transplants under tacrolimus and sirolimus immunosuppression, Group B (n = 8). Non-Gal antibody was measured by flow cytometry and by western blots using GT-KO EC membrane antigens. A nanoLC/MS/MS analysis of proteins recovered from 2D gels was used to identify target antigens.

resultsGroup A recipients exhibited a mixed cellular and humoral rejection. Group B recipients mainly exhibited classical DXR. Western blot analysis showed a non-Gal antibody response induced by GT+ and GT-KO hearts to an overlapping set of pig aortic EC membrane antigens. Proteomic analysis identified 14 potential target antigens but failed to define several immunodominant targets.

conclusionsThese experiments indicate that the non-Gal antibody response is directed to a number of stress response and inflammation related pig EC antigens and a few undefined targets. Further analysis of these antibody specificities using alternative methods is required to more fully define the repertoire of non-Gal antibody responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAntibodies, HeterophileAntibody SpecificityDisaccharidesGraft RejectionHeart TransplantationHumansPapio anubisProteomicsSwineTransplantation, HeterologousAntibodies, HeterophileDisaccharidesgalactosyl-(1-3)galactose

Identifiers

PMID18957049
PMCPMC2586876
OpenAlexW2044950555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.