Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18955969›Full record

ReviewOncogene2008

Calcium and apoptosis: ER-mitochondria Ca2+ transfer in the control of apoptosis.

P Pinton, C Giorgi, R Siviero, E Zecchini, R Rizzuto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 560 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
560citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

560 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Baohuoside I CombatedAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. BCL-2 and BCL-xL in Cancer: Regulation, Function, and Therapeutic Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

500 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P PintonDepartment of Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, Section of General Pathology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
C Giorgi
R Siviero
E Zecchini
R Rizzuto

Funding

TRANSLOCATION OF p66Shc: KINETICS, FUNCTION, APOPTOSISP01AG025532 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KIM, KYOUNGMI · 2007 to 2017
$12.1M
NIA NIH HHS 1P01AG25532-01A1NIA NIH HHS P01 AG025532Telethon GTF01011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing consensus that the various forms of cell death (necrosis, apoptosis and autophagy) are not separated by strict boundaries, but rather share molecular effectors and signaling routes. Among the latter, a clear role is played by calcium (Ca(2+)), the ubiquitous second messenger involved in the control of a broad variety of physiological events. Fine tuning of intracellular Ca(2+) homeostasis by anti- and proapoptotic proteins shapes the Ca(2+) signal to which mitochondria and other cellular effectors are exposed, and hence the efficiency of various cell death inducers. Here, we will review: (i) the evidence linking calcium homeostasis to the regulation of apoptotic, and more recently autophagic cell death, (ii) the discussion of mitochondria as a critical, although not unique checkpoint and (iii) the molecular and functional elucidation of ER/mitochondria contacts, corresponding to the mitochondria-associated membrane (MAM) subfraction and proposed to be a specialized signaling microdomain.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCalciumCytosolEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansCalcium

Identifiers

PMID18955969
PMCPMC2844952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.