ArticleJournal of virology1991
Avian reovirus S1133 can replicate in mouse L cells: effect of pH and cell attachment status on viral infection.
Article in Journal of virology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The stimulatory effect of actinomycin D on avian reovirus replication in L cells suggests that translational competition dictates the fate of the infection.Journal of virology · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous reports have suggested that avian reovirus S1133 fails to replicate in mouse L cells. In this article, we report that replication does occur under certain culture conditions. The avian reovirus was found to grow in mouse L cells at pH 6.4 and 7.2 but not at pH 8.2. Culture medium with a basic pH directly inhibited viral transcription and genome replication. As a result, viral protein synthesis was also affected. At permissive pH levels, avian reovirus grew better in monolayers than in suspension cultures of L cells because of the influence of cell attachment status on viral macromolecular synthesis. Our results not only show that avian reovirus can replicate in mouse L cells but also help to explain why it did not in previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.