Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18951974›Full record

ArticleCellular signalling2009

Altered EGFR localization and degradation in human breast cancer cells with an amphiregulin/EGFR autocrine loop.

Nicole E Willmarth, Andrea Baillo, Michele L Dziubinski, Kristy Wilson, David J Riese, Stephen P Ethier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular signalling, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole E WillmarthDepartment of Cancer Biology, Kimmel Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Andrea Baillo
Michele L Dziubinski
Kristy Wilson
David J Riese
Stephen P Ethier
The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Breast cancer oncogenes on the 8p11 amplicon.R01CA100724 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ETHIER, STEPHEN P. · 2003 to 2014
$3.5M
ERBB-2 AND GROWTH FACTOR INDEPENDENCE IN BREAST CANCERR01CA070354 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ETHIER, STEPHEN P. · 1996 to 2004
$1.5M
Regulation of ErbB4 Signaling by Neuregulin IsoformsR01CA114209 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI RIESE, DAVID J. · 2006 to 2010
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA070354NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100724NCI NIH HHS R01 CA114209NCI NIH HHS R01 CA70354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its ligand amphiregulin (AR) have been shown to be co-over expressed in breast cancer. We have previously shown that an AR/EGFR autocrine loop is required for SUM149 human breast cancer cell proliferation, motility and invasion. We also demonstrated that AR can induce these altered phenotypes when expressed in the normal mammary epithelial cell line MCF10A, or by exposure of these cells to AR in the medium. In the present studies, we demonstrate that SUM149 cells and immortalized human mammary epithelial MCF10A cells that over express AR (MCF10A AR) or are cultured in the presence of exogenous AR, express higher levels of EGFR protein than MCF10A cells cultured in EGF. Pulse-chase analysis showed that EGFR protein remained stable in the presence of AR, yet was degraded in the presence of EGF. Consistent with this observation, tyrosine 1045 on the EGFR, the c-cbl binding site, exhibited less phosphorylation following stimulation with AR than following stimulation with EGF. Ubiquitination of the receptor was also dramatically less following stimulation with AR than following stimulation with EGF. Flow cytometry analysis showed that EGFR remained on the cell surface following stimulation with AR but was rapidly internalized following stimulation with EGF. Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy confirmed the flow cytometry results. EGFR in MCF10A cells cultured in the presence of EGF exhibited a predominantly intracellular, punctate localization. In stark contrast, SUM149 cells and MCF10A cells growing in the presence of AR expressed EGFR predominantly on the membrane and at cell-cell junctions. We propose that AR alters EGFR internalization and degradation in a way that favors accumulation of EGFR at the cell surface and ultimately leads to changes in EGFR signaling.

Indexed as

Autocrine CommunicationAmphiregulinBinding SitesBreast NeoplasmsCells, CulturedEGF Family of ProteinsEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsGlycoproteinsHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPhosphorylationTumor Cells, CulturedUbiquitinationUp-RegulationAmphiregulinAREG protein, humanEGF Family of ProteinsEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsGlycoproteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18951974
PMCPMC2632975
OpenAlexW1980995086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.